Files
olp/CLAUDE.md
T
74e67fdca3 chore(release): Phase 7 close — v0.7.0 (Solution 1 + opus 4.8) (#70)
Closes Phase 7 with version bump from 0.5.1 to 0.7.0 plus CHANGELOG
promotion plus README "Security Model" section plus CLAUDE.md
release_kit overlay update.

Phase 7 ship summary:
- PR #66 — ADR 0014 Amendment 1 + ADR 0002 Amendment 9 (governance,
  4-layer Solution 1 architecture + Provider ISOLATION contract)
- PR #67 — PI231 spike verifying HOME / CODEX_HOME redirect on prod
  target (claude v2.1.152 + codex v0.133.0)
- PR #68 — Solution 1 implementation + opus 4.8 model registration
  (lib/sandbox/manager.mjs refactored; ISOLATION blocks on anthropic
  + codex; server.mjs wire-up; models-registry.json)
- PR #69 — Loader fix (lib/providers/index.mjs attaches ISOLATION
  named export onto provider default export) + test-context bypass
  for streaming singleflight cache test compatibility

Phase 7 verification (PI231 prod E2E with claude v2.1.154 +
codex v0.133.0 + OLP_SANDBOX_DISABLED=1):
- Real ~/.claude.json mtime unchanged across requests
- Real ~/.codex/auth.json mtime unchanged
- find ~/.claude.json ~/.claude ~/.codex -newer marker returns EMPTY
- claude-sonnet-4-6, claude-opus-4-8, gpt-5.5 all respond correctly
- Audit log captures per-request key_id + provider + model + latency
- Tested from MacBook (172.16.2.29) and PI230 (172.16.2.230) clients

Pre-Phase-7-close upgrades:
- PI231 claude CLI: 2.1.152 to 2.1.154
- Mac mini OpenClaw: 2026.5.22 to 2026.5.27 (via openclaw update)
- PI230 Hermes: 0.14.0 to 0.15.1 (pip + systemctl restart)

File changes:
- package.json: 0.5.1 to 0.7.0
- CHANGELOG.md: Unreleased promoted to v0.7.0 dated 2026-05-29 with
  full ship summary; PR-B (original outer-bwrap) explicitly marked
  SUPERSEDED with archive branch reference
- README.md:
  - "Known limitations" last bullet updated: ADR 0014 reference now
    points to Amendment 1 (Solution 1) instead of superseded PR-B
  - New "Security Model" subsection with 3 trust tiers
    (shared-os-user / per-os-user / separate-vm) + per-provider
    crossTenantReadProtection table + attribution-vs-isolation
    layering note
- CLAUDE.md release_kit overlay:
  - current_phase: "Phase 6" to "Phase 7 closed at v0.7.0
    (2026-05-29); Phase 8 not yet scoped"
  - current_pre_release_identifier: 0.6.0-phase6 to 0.7.0

Test status: 813/813 pass; Suite 44 (PI231 Layer 3 E2E placeholder)
documented as deferred (load-bearing isolation negative test now
delivered by the PI231 prod E2E in the Phase 7 verification above).

Tag: v0.7.0 pushed post-merge to trigger
.github/workflows/release.yml per release_kit overlay.

Co-authored-by: dtzp555 <dtzp555@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-05-29 11:24:42 +10:00

142 lines
9.1 KiB
Markdown

@AGENTS.md
@~/.cc-rules/AGENTS.md
# OLP Project Session Instructions
> **WARNING — READ BEFORE WRITING ANY CODE IN THIS REPO**
>
> Before touching any provider plugin (`lib/providers/*.mjs`), the entry surface (`server.mjs` request handlers), or the IR (`lib/ir/*`), read [`./ALIGNMENT.md`](./ALIGNMENT.md) in full. The constitution is binding. Non-compliant commits are reverted.
---
## Before starting any task
1. Read `./ALIGNMENT.md`. Internalize the five Rules and the three-authority model (per-provider CLI / OpenAI spec / IR contract).
2. Run `/dev-start <task description>` to get a pre-flight plan that incorporates the iron rules, `SKILL_ROUTING.md`, this file, and `ALIGNMENT.md`.
3. Locate the provider authority **before** drafting any code:
- Provider-plugin change → identify the provider CLI documentation page or observed behaviour you are matching, and pin the CLI version.
- Entry-surface change → identify the OpenAI `/v1/chat/completions` spec section and URL.
- IR change → identify the ADR you are amending or co-merging.
No code is written ahead of the authority citation.
---
## Hard requirements for plugin / server.mjs / IR changes
Every PR that modifies a provider plugin, the entry surface in `server.mjs`, or the IR in `lib/ir/` must satisfy all three of the following. A PR missing any one of them is blocked from merge.
1. **Authority citation.** The commit message and PR body declare the relevant authority and citation:
- Provider plugin → `<provider> CLI <version> § <section-or-flag>` plus URL or transcript reference.
- Entry surface → OpenAI spec URL plus the specific field, parameter, or behaviour.
- IR → `ADR NNNN § <section>` (and the amending ADR if applicable).
If the underlying authority does not perform the operation, the PR must state this explicitly and justify scope under `ALIGNMENT.md` Rule 2 (in practice, this almost always means the PR should be closed).
2. **CI `alignment.yml` pass.** The workflow must pass. It greps for known-hallucinated tokens, validates `models-registry.json`, and soft-checks per-provider commit citations. New blacklist tokens are added via PR amendment to `alignment.yml`; removing entries requires an `ALIGNMENT.md` amendment PR. Do not suppress the workflow.
3. **Independent reviewer (Iron Rule 10).** The implementation author may not self-approve. A separate reviewer — human or a subagent spawned with a fresh context — must read the diff, open the cited authority (provider CLI doc / OpenAI spec / ADR), and explicitly confirm the citation. A review comment that does not confirm the authority was checked is not a valid approval.
---
## Iron rules in force
This repo operates under the CC Development Iron Rules (CC 开发铁律) v1.4. Three rules are load-bearing for OLP work:
- **Iron Rule 10 (Code Review).** Every implementation phase has an independent reviewer. Self-review does not count. See hard requirement #3 above.
- **Iron Rule 11 (Incremental Diff Review).** Non-trivial work is split into the minimum reviewable unit — one PR per layer per severity. `ALIGNMENT.md`, this file, the PR template, and the CI workflows are shipped as a single constitutional PR (one layer: governance). Subsequent layers (plugin loader, individual provider plugins, IR serializers, cache layer, fallback engine, dashboard) each land as their own PR.
- **Iron Rule 12 (Pre-Brainstorm Prior-Art Search).** Before proposing any new IR field, fallback trigger, or provider plugin, search the relevant provider's docs, OpenAI's spec, the local `docs/adr/`, and the cross-machine `~/.cc-rules/memory/learnings/`. The provider-specific search is the decisive one: if the provider CLI does not perform the operation, Rule 2 of the constitution applies.
The full iron rules are at `~/.claude/CC_DEV_IRON_RULES.md` (symlinked from the cc-rules repo on the maintainer's workstations). Load them into session context with `/cc-rules` when needed.
---
## Skills relevant to this repo
- `/dev-start` — pre-flight planning, always first for non-trivial tasks.
- `/cc-rules` — load the iron rules into context.
- `/agent-dispatch` — pick the correct model (opus for design and review, sonnet for straightforward edits, haiku for mechanical chores) before spawning any subagent.
- `/cc-mem search <keyword>` — look up cross-machine memory for prior decisions, especially provider-policy events and CLI-version migrations.
---
## Commit message conventions
- Subject line uses Conventional Commits (`fix:`, `feat:`, `docs:`, `refactor:`, `chore:`).
- Provider-plugin commits include the citation pattern `<provider> CLI <version>` or a direct provider docs URL in the body. CI performs a soft check.
- Entry-surface commits include an OpenAI spec URL.
- IR commits cite the authorizing or amending ADR.
- Any assertion of the form "Provider X uses Y" in the body must be immediately followed by a citation (CLI version + section, or docs URL, or observed-transcript reference). CI soft-checks the pattern.
- Co-author trailer is required for LLM-assisted commits (`Co-Authored-By: Claude <model> <noreply@anthropic.com>`).
---
## Project-level escalation
If a design decision cannot be resolved by reference to the relevant authority (provider CLI / OpenAI spec / ADR) and `ALIGNMENT.md`, escalate to the project maintainer via `/cc-chat` rather than guessing. Silent guessing is what produced OCP's 2026-04-11 drift; OLP inherits that institutional lesson and does not repeat it.
---
## Release kit overlay (CC 开发铁律 第五律 5.5)
This project's overlay per iron rule v1.4's 5.5. Machine-checkable declaration.
```yaml
release_kit:
version_source: package.json
changelog: CHANGELOG.md
release_channel:
type: github-release
tag_format: v{semver}
auto_create_on_tag_push: true # via .github/workflows/release.yml
docs_source: README.md
resource_lists:
- name: Supported Providers table
location: README.md § "Supported Providers"
source_of_truth: models-registry.json
- name: Routing chains table
location: README.md § "Configuration"
- name: API Endpoints table
location: README.md § "API Endpoints"
- name: Environment Variables table
location: README.md § "Environment Variables"
new_feature_doc_expectations:
- new provider plugin → README § "Supported Providers" entry + ADR 0006 inclusion entry + risk-tier classification
- new fallback trigger → README § "Configuration" + tests in test-features.mjs
- new IR field → ADR 0003 amendment + README impact note (if user-visible)
- new env var → README § "Environment Variables" table
- new endpoint → README § "API Endpoints" table + relevant Config / Troubleshooting §
- new auto-sync / hook → dedicated §, must document trigger + manual invocation + opt-out + any bootstrap quirk
- new file / SPOT / schema → Architecture or contributor § with link
bootstrap_quirk_policy:
- any first-run migration quirk (e.g., from OCP) → README § "Troubleshooting" + scripts/migrate-from-ocp.mjs if applicable
# NOTE: scripts/migrate-from-ocp.mjs is planned (Phase 7), not yet authored. The scripts/ directory
# does not currently exist. References here are forward-looking; do not attempt to run this script.
phase_rolling_mode:
# Iron Rule 5 (release-kit version bump before push) applies at Phase boundaries,
# NOT to individual D-day commits within a Phase.
#
# Rationale: OLP Phase 1 is a single cohesive deliverable (boot layer + provider
# plugins + cache + fallback engine + hardening). Bumping a version tag for every
# D-day push would produce 30+ noise tags with no user-facing semantic boundary.
# ADR 0005 § "Cache key stability" requires that key composition is stable across
# a release; mid-phase tag churn would falsely signal stability windows.
#
# Policy:
# - While a Phase is in progress, individual D-day pushes land under "Unreleased"
# in CHANGELOG.md. package.json stays at the Phase-N pre-release identifier
# (e.g. "0.1.0-bootstrap" during Phase 1 boot; the token may be updated to
# "0.1.0-phase1" once Phase 1 implementation starts landing).
# - The version bump + git tag fires at Phase CLOSE — a dedicated "Phase N close"
# PR that bumps package.json, promotes "Unreleased" to the release version in
# CHANGELOG.md, and triggers .github/workflows/release.yml via the tag push.
# - The Phase close PR is triggered explicitly by the project maintainer; it is
# NOT automatic. No automated tooling bumps the version.
# - Cross-Phase discipline: if D-day work touches a boundary already tagged (e.g.
# a hotfix to a shipped Phase N deliverable), follow Iron Rule 5 normally — bump
# patch, tag, release before pushing.
#
# This overlay is the authoritative source. If Iron Rule 5 appears to be silently
# violated (no version bump after many D-day pushes), check this section first
# before filing a compliance finding.
current_phase: Phase 7 closed at v0.7.0 (2026-05-29); Phase 8 not yet scoped
current_pre_release_identifier: "0.7.0"
phase_close_trigger: explicit maintainer action (not automated)
```