mirror of
https://github.com/dtzp555-max/olp.git
synced 2026-07-21 21:15:10 +00:00
7ef551083782f359372013f94c93d5add8bed6ad
4
Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
  taodengandClaude Opus 4.7
|
e10b7d7cb9 |
docs(adr-0004)+chore: D22 — defer soft triggers to v1.x (round-2 F2)
cold-audit catch from 2026-05-24
Round-2 cold-audit Finding 2 (P2 feature-surface vs data-ingestion drift).
ADR 0004 § Trigger taxonomy documented soft triggers (credit_pool_percent,
daily_request_count, five_hour_window_percent) as a live, configurable
feature category. But `evaluateSoftTriggers` in lib/fallback/engine.mjs
is functionally inert at v0.1:
- buildDefaultChain hardcodes quotaSnapshot: null on every hop
- No call site for provider.quotaStatus() in server.mjs or engine.mjs
(only definitions in the 3 provider plugins, all currently stubs)
- evaluateSoftTriggers correctly short-circuits to false on null snapshot
A user populating routing.soft_triggers in ~/.olp/config.json gets zero
runtime behavior. Round-1 cold audit + D5/D9 diff-review reviewers all
focused on evaluation correctness; nobody traced the production data
path end-to-end.
Owner decision (after considering wire-vs-defer): defer to v1.x. Wiring
quotaStatus() polling requires per-hop async I/O before each spawn
decision, error handling for providers without quota endpoints (all 3
current providers fall in this bucket: claude -p, codex exec --json,
vibe --prompt — none expose quota), a caching layer to avoid re-polling,
and a latency budget for a pre-spawn network call. Implementation cost
high; v0.1 value zero.
Strategy: defer the FEATURE (data ingestion path), not the CODE (evaluation
logic). evaluateSoftTriggers is small, well-tested via unit tests that
inject snapshots directly (test-features.mjs:3617-3665), and
architecturally correct. v1.x reactivation requires only wiring the
data path — evaluation stays untouched.
Changes (3 files, +25 / -1):
1. docs/adr/0004-fallback-engine.md +15 — new Amendment 2 block at top
of doc (after Amendment 1, before § Context, matching D11/D15/D16/
Amendment 1 placement convention):
- Finding (cold-audit round-2 F2 + 3 concrete code-state facts)
- Decision (defer; keep evaluation code inert-but-correct)
- Rationale (3-point cost/value analysis)
- Effect on § Trigger taxonomy (inline deferral note appended; design
prose preserved)
- What v1.x reactivation looks like (3 concrete steps; no rewrite needed)
- Procedural mechanism (CC 开发铁律 v1.6 § 10.x — round-2 caught it)
Plus an inline "📋 Deferred to v1.x (Amendment 2)" sub-bullet in
§ Trigger taxonomy → Soft triggers entry. The 3 threshold descriptions
are preserved verbatim — the architectural design remains the v1.x
intent.
2. lib/fallback/engine.mjs +8 / -1 — comment-only updates on the 2
`quotaSnapshot: null` lines in buildDefaultChain. Each now reads:
```
// quotaSnapshot stays null at v0.1 — soft triggers deferred to v1.x per
// ADR 0004 Amendment 2. evaluateSoftTriggers correctly short-circuits to
// false when quotaSnapshot is null. The polling path is not wired in v0.1.
```
No code logic changed. The previous misleading comment "populated at
runtime if provider.quotaStatus() is called" (which falsely implied a
live wiring) is replaced.
3. README.md +3 — two additions:
- Deferral callout immediately after the routing.soft_triggers config
example block, naming Amendment 2
- Implementation status table row: "Soft trigger data path
(quotaStatus() polling) | 📋 Planned (v1.x) | Evaluation logic
shipped + tested; data ingestion deferred per ADR 0004 Amendment 2"
Tests: 335/335 unchanged — pure docs + comment deferral, no behavior
change. Existing unit tests for evaluateSoftTriggers (which inject
snapshots directly) continue to validate the evaluation correctness
independent of the production ingestion path.
Authority:
- ADR 0004 self-amendment (Amendment 2 in-place)
- ALIGNMENT.md Rule 1 (Cite First) + CLAUDE.md § "Hard requirements"
item 1 — contract status changes require ADR amendment
- CC 开发铁律 v1.6 § 10.x — Round-2 Cold Audit caught this
Reviewer (Iron Rule v1.6 § 10.x Mode A, fresh-context opus, independent
of drafter): APPROVE. Verified all 3 framing claims independently:
(a) buildDefaultChain hardcodes null on both branches — confirmed at
engine.mjs:421 and :444; (b) zero quotaStatus() call sites in production
— `grep -rn "quotaStatus("` found only 3 definitions in provider plugins
+ JSDoc mentions; (c) evaluateSoftTriggers correctly short-circuits at
engine.mjs:139. Reactivation realism check: all 3 v1.x steps map to
existing surfaces (insertion points, hop shape, test fixtures).
Follow-up items (reviewer's non-blocking notes, NOT in this PR):
- README line 154 still reads "328-test suite"; current is 335 — pre-
existing doc-sync drift to pick up in D25 P3 batch
- v1.x ADR 0002 amendment may need to formally define authContext shape
(currently informal in the contract); pre-note as a dependency
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
||
|
taodengandClaude Opus 4.7
|
d85a2dcf71 |
docs: D20 — honest forward-reference annotations across README/ADRs (Finding 9)
cold-audit catch from 2026-05-23
Cold-audit Finding 9 (P3 drift): multiple docs referenced files / paths
/ directories that don't exist at the current implementation state. A
reader following AGENTS.md § "Key files to know" to read lib/keys.mjs
would find no such file; following README architecture to dashboard.html
same; ADR 0005 § D1 described a `~/.olp/cache/<key>/<prefix>/<hash>.json`
layout that doesn't exist (current impl is in-memory Map per
lib/cache/store.mjs). D20 doesn't gut the designs — it adds honest
status callouts so the gap is obvious within seconds.
Files changed (8, docs only, +46 / -14):
1. README.md (+32 / -3):
- New H2 section "Implementation status (as of 2026-05-24)" with a
10-row table distinguishing ✅ Shipped vs 📋 Planned, including phase
numbers (Phase 2 / 6 / 7) matching the existing §"Phase plan"
- Inline status annotation on the multi-key auth bullet
(lib/keys.mjs marked planned for Phase 2)
- Inline status on the cache layer bullet (file-backed storage marked
Phase 2 — current is in-memory Map)
- Migration section's Phase 7 placeholder annotated explicitly
2. AGENTS.md (+8 / -3):
- Inline `📋 Planned (Phase N) — not yet authored` markers on
lib/keys.mjs and dashboard.html in the "Key files" bullet list
- Inline marker on setup.mjs reference in the
"Project-specific constraints" section
- New "Implementation status note" paragraph at the end of the Key
files block pointing to README's status table for the full picture
3. ALIGNMENT.md (+6 / -3):
- docs/openai-spec-pin.md references (Authority 2 + audits section)
tightened from "deferred" to "deferred, not yet authored; must be
created before first annual audit (target: v1.0)"
- docs/alignment-audits/ directory annotated as "directory does not
exist yet; it is created when the first audit is conducted"
4. CLAUDE.md (+2):
- release_kit.bootstrap_quirk_policy YAML retains the
scripts/migrate-from-ocp.mjs reference (forward-looking spec
compliance) and adds an inline YAML comment explicitly noting
"is planned (Phase 7), not yet authored. The scripts/ directory
does not currently exist. References here are forward-looking;
do not attempt to run this script."
5-8. ADR amendments (status notes only — no Amendment blocks, since
these are clarifications about implementation state, NOT decision
changes per se):
- ADR 0001 (Consequences/Negative): scripts/migrate-from-ocp.mjs
annotated as Phase 7 planned
- ADR 0003 § Decision (lossy-translation paragraph): inline note that
docs/provider-caveats.md is planned; until it exists, lossy edges
are recorded only in plugin headers. Plus a status mention in
Consequences/Positive
- ADR 0004 Mitigations: docs/provider-caveats.md annotated as planned
- ADR 0005 § Decision (D1 paragraph): the file-backed layout block
reframed from "Cache directory structure:" to "Designed file-backed
layout (target for Phase 2 storage adapter):". Added a status
blockquote explicitly noting "v0.1 implementation in lib/cache/store.mjs
uses an in-memory Map; no files written to ~/.olp/cache/. The
file-backed layout described above is the designed shape; it
transitions in via a Phase 2 storage adapter. Per-key isolation and
singleflight (D4) are live; file persistence is not."
Note on ADR Decision-section edits (corrected from initial writeup):
two ADR amendments DO touch Decision-section text (ADR 0003 lossy-
translation paragraph, ADR 0005 D1 cache layout). Both edits are
conservative — status caveats that preserve the original prose verbatim
(0003) or reframe section headings without changing the path-shape spec
(0005). No design content is gutted. No Amendment block was added
because the decisions themselves aren't changing; these are clarifications
about what's live today vs designed. The discipline boundary here:
inline-status-note ≠ decision-amendment.
Tests: 328/328 unchanged (sanity check; docs-only changes).
7/7 Finding 9 forward references annotated (confirmed by reviewer
running independent `ls` on each path):
- lib/keys.mjs ❌ doesn't exist → annotated
- dashboard.html ❌ doesn't exist → annotated
- docs/provider-caveats.md ❌ → annotated (2 ADR sites + Consequences)
- docs/openai-spec-pin.md ❌ → annotated (ALIGNMENT.md Authority 2)
- docs/alignment-audits/ ❌ → annotated
- scripts/migrate-from-ocp.mjs ❌ → annotated (README + ADR 0001 + CLAUDE.md release_kit)
- setup.mjs ❌ → annotated (AGENTS.md)
Authority:
- README/AGENTS.md/ADR/ALIGNMENT.md/CLAUDE.md self — the doc set is
its own authority for what it documents; D20 brings each statement
into honest agreement with the current implementation
- CC 开发铁律 v1.6 § 10.x — Cold Audit Finding 9
Reviewer (Iron Rule v1.6 § 10.x Mode A, fresh-context opus, independent
of drafter): APPROVE_WITH_MINOR. Verified each Finding 9 path doesn't
exist via independent `ls`; cross-checked phase numbers match the
existing §"Phase plan" listing; ran `npm test` to confirm 328/328
unchanged. Two non-blocking minors:
1. Implementer's initial writeup overstated "ADR decision text NOT
edited" — reality is two Decision-section paragraphs got inline
status caveats. Commit message above is corrected.
2. Reviewer found an additional drift D20 didn't address: ADR 0002 §
Decision filesystem layout lists `vibe.mjs` for the Mistral plugin,
but the shipped file is `mistral.mjs` (the binary is `vibe`, the
plugin file is `mistral`). Different drift class from Finding 9
(file exists, just named differently in the ADR). Filed as
follow-up issue.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
||
|
taodengandClaude Opus 4.7
|
91223ee9ab |
docs(governance): fold in 6 codex review findings
External Codex CLI review surfaced 6 substantive findings beyond what
the internal opus reviewer caught at D1. All folded in this commit.
Files changed: ALIGNMENT.md, README.md, ADR 0001, ADR 0006, CHANGELOG.
1. Provider Inventory split: Candidate vs Enabled
- Bootstrap previously listed anthropic/openai/mistral as Tier D
default-enabled with Authority pins still "TBD at Phase N spawn".
This violated Rule 1 (Cite First) and Rule 3 (Match Implementation).
- v0.1 founding now ships 0 Enabled Providers. All 8 are Candidate.
Enablement requires: authority pin filled + plugin landed + Phase
audit passed.
2. Antigravity Tier A downgraded to "evidence-backed pending pin"
- Secondary reports disagree on blast radius (piunikaweb 03-02 says
AI-tier only; piunikaweb 02-23 + OpenClaw issue + VentureBeat say
broader). Google FAQ language naming OpenClaw/OpenCode/Claude Code
is cited from secondary sources only — primary URL not pinned.
- Exclusion remains active by default; constitutional weight matches
evidence. Primary-source pinning tracked as one-shot audit task
with 90-day Tier-reconsideration trigger.
3. ADR 0001 supersession scope narrowed
- Previous draft claimed OLP is "the structural shape ADR 0005
endorsed," but ADR 0005's separate-repo recommendation came with
"BYOK from day one" + "no cli.js spawn" qualifiers OLP rejects.
- Supersession now narrowly scoped to "single-provider-sufficiency
premise only"; BYOK + no-spawn parts of ADR 0005 explicitly NOT
inherited.
4. Anthropic post-2026-06-15 one-shot audit scheduled
- Annual 14 May audit would leave the Anthropic Tier re-eval almost
a year late after the 2026-06-15 split.
- Added one-shot audit for 2026-06-16 (or first billing-cycle close)
verifying observed behaviour matches spec §2 assumptions.
5. Tier A "permanent" wording unified
- ALIGNMENT.md and ADR 0006 disagreed (permanent vs amendable).
Unified as "Excluded by default. Cannot be re-included unless
ADR 0006 is superseded/amended with new primary-source evidence."
6. OpenAI Tier D wording softened
- Discussion #8338 was framed as "maintainer confirmed permissive";
actual quote is a maintainer posture statement with explicit "I'm
an engineer, not a lawyer" caveat.
- Now: "maintainer signal indicates low risk; formal ToS pin pending."
Reviewer: OpenAI Codex CLI (external, fresh-context). Iron Rule 10
satisfied — internal opus reviewer was not the source of these
findings; reviewer and maintainer are distinct.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
||
|
taodengandClaude Opus 4.7
|
0041fb1017 |
chore: bootstrap OLP v0.1 — multi-provider LLM proxy
Initial release. OLP (Open LLM Proxy) is a personal- and family-scale
multi-provider LLM proxy that supersedes OCP (Open Claude Proxy).
Trigger: Anthropic's 2026-05-14 announcement (effective 2026-06-15)
moves `claude -p` / Agent SDK / third-party agent traffic out of the
Pro/Max subscription pool into a separate fixed monthly Agent SDK
Credit pool. OCP's foundational assumption ("subscription = unlimited
within rate limits") breaks for Anthropic on that date. Spreading
risk across multiple providers is the structural response.
Phase 0 lands:
- ALIGNMENT.md (constitution: 5 Rules, 3 Authorities, 4-tier Risk
Framework, 8-provider inventory)
- AGENTS.md (multi-tool agent guidelines; inherits cc-rules)
- CLAUDE.md (Claude-Code session instructions + release_kit overlay)
- README.md (phase-aware skeleton)
- docs/adr/0001-0006 (Founding ADRs: project founding / plugin
architecture / IR design / fallback engine / cross-provider cache /
provider inclusion + risk-tier framework)
- .github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md (8-radio Change Type + per-type
Authority Evidence + Iron Rule 10 reviewer checklist)
- .github/workflows/alignment.yml (blacklist + Antigravity exclusion
enforcement + models-registry validator + commit-citation soft check)
- .github/workflows/release.yml (auto-release on tag with version
match check per Iron Rule 5)
- .github/workflows/test.yml (Node 20/24 matrix, bootstrap-tolerant)
- package.json, .gitignore, LICENSE (MIT), CHANGELOG.md
Provider inventory at bootstrap:
Tier D (default-enabled): anthropic, openai, mistral
Tier C (opt-in): grok, kimi
Tier B (opt-in + consent): minimax, glm, qwen
Tier A (permanently excluded): google-antigravity
Supersedes OCP ADR 0005 (No Multi-Provider) per OLP ADR 0001. OCP
will enter maintenance mode when OLP v0.1 ships per Phase 7 plan.
Iron Rule 10 gate: fresh-context independent opus reviewer audited
all 15 governance files against OLP v0.1 spec + OCP precedent.
Verdict: APPROVE_WITH_MINOR. Two minor findings folded in:
1. alignment.yml heredoc EOF moved to column 0 (was indented;
bash parse failed silently on real blacklist hits, printing
a cryptic "syntax error" instead of the structured ALIGNMENT
GUARDRAIL FAILURE banner).
2. AGENTS.md clarified that the SPOT discipline for
models-registry.json will be codified by a Phase-1 ADR (OLP
ADR 0003 is currently the IR design, not a SPOT codification;
OCP's ADR 0003 is the precedent but OLP's registry shape
differs and warrants its own ADR).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
|