Files
olp/ALIGNMENT.md
T
taodengandClaude Opus 4.7 d6347e33f2 docs(governance): D31 — ADR amendment trio (F5 ADR 0003 + F11 ADR 0005 § D2 + F13/F14 ALIGNMENT Speculative-Candidate class)
cold-audit catch from 2026-05-24 (round 3)

Three coordinated governance amendments per the major-decisions already
made (per "继续吧 unless major decision" + my F5/F11/F13+F14 option-(b)
calls earlier in the session). All P3-class, all docs-only. Single
PR per IDR cleanup-batch convention given the unified theme
("spec was aspirational; reality is X; amend spec to match").

Changes (3 docs files, +52 / -2):

1. docs/adr/0003-intermediate-representation.md — Amendment 1 (NEW
   Amendments section, first ever for ADR 0003):
   - F5 closure: removes the unimplemented `__irRoundTripTest()`
     export-name claim from § Mitigations. The mental model
     (symmetric irToNative+nativeToIR pair on each plugin) does NOT
     fit the actual plugin shape (asymmetric spawn-wrappers:
     request→CLI-args+stdin, response-stream→IR-chunks). Zero plugins
     export this function.
   - Documents the substitute test strategy that IS live at v0.1:
     · Suite 3 covers entry-surface IR↔OpenAI round-trip
     · Per-plugin spawn-with-mock test blocks cover IR→CLI→IR-chunk
     · Lossy-translation edges documented inline in each plugin's
       header comment (mistral.mjs DOCS-N markers being the most
       thorough; anthropic.mjs + codex.mjs carry equivalent tables)
   - Future plugins MUST satisfy both (a) spawn-with-mock test block
     and (b) header lossy-field documentation — the enforcement
     mechanism replacing the original export-name aspiration.
   - Original § Mitigations bullet replaced with a pointer to
     Amendment 1 (preserves history).

2. docs/adr/0005-cache-cross-provider.md — Amendment 5 (after D27
   Amendment 4):
   - F11 closure: acknowledges that the "Anthropic's own prompt cache
     is consulted at the provider" half of § D2 is structurally
     impossible at v0.1.
   - Root cause: Anthropic plugin uses `claude -p --output-format text`
     (verified at anthropic.mjs:196), a plain-text wire surface that
     has no Messages-API field for cache_control markers. The markers
     are also stripped at IR construction (openai-to-ir.mjs:45-89
     whitelists fields, drops cache_control) per ADR 0003 IR design
     reaffirmed in D27 Amendment 4 (F10).
   - Clarifies v0.1 effective behavior: OLP-cache-bypass works
     correctly (no double-caching when Anthropic + markers); the
     delegate-to-Anthropic-prompt-cache half does not fire.
   - Forward path (v1.x): switch Anthropic plugin to --output-format
     json (NDJSON wire) or direct Messages API spawn — substantial
     parser rewrite; deferred since no user has requested delegation.
   - § D2 paragraph stays intact; an inline parenthetical reference
     to Amendment 5 is added immediately after the affected sentence.

3. ALIGNMENT.md — new "Rule 4 exception class — Speculative-Candidate
   Plugin" sub-section after Rule 5, before § Authorities:
   - F13+F14 closure: formalizes the gap between strict ALIGNMENT
     Rule 2 (no speculative shape assumptions) + Rule 4 (unalignable
     plugins are deleted, not feature-flagged) and the actual practice
     where Codex (D6) + Mistral (D8) plugins ship with explicit
     UNPINNED assumptions documented in their headers, gated as
     Candidate-not-Enabled.
   - 5 precise conditions for a Speculative-Candidate plugin:
     (1) STATIC_REGISTRY entry present, (2) candidate: true in
     models-registry, (3) NOT in any user's providers.enabled config,
     (4) header has explicit UNPINNED assumption section with labeled
     IDs and planned-pin triggers, (5) defensive multi-shape parsers
     tied to UNPINNED markers (greppable for future single-shape
     replacement).
   - Enablement criteria (Speculative-Candidate → Enabled): 3 explicit
     requirements (remove UNPINNED labels from header; replace
     multi-shape parsers with single-shape; file pin ADR amendment).
   - Currently-in-class table:
     · codex.mjs (D6) — A3 (auth token field name), A4 (NDJSON event
       schema)
     · mistral.mjs (D8) — A4 (JSON output event schema), A5 (model
       flag), A6 (exact model IDs), A7 (streaming vs json output
       mode), A8 (stdin prompt passing)
   - Anthropic explicitly NOT in this class (CLI version pinned at
     @anthropic-ai/claude-code v2.1.89 per Provider Authority Pins
     table).
   - CI enforcement noted as deferred (reviewer obligation today; a
     future PR may add grep-based gate).

Pre-commit fold-in (per evidence-first checkpoint #4):
- **D31 reviewer flagged wording precision** ("Provider Inventory
  table above" was structurally wrong — the table is BELOW the new
  sub-section). Folded in: 1-word fix "above" → "below" on the
  Speculative-Candidate condition #2.

Tests: 400/400 unchanged (docs-only).

Authority:
- ADR 0003 § Mitigations (modified) + new Amendment 1 (self-amendment)
- ADR 0005 § D2 (annotated) + new Amendment 5 (self-amendment)
- ALIGNMENT.md § Rules (extended with Rule 4 exception class)
- D27 F10 Amendment 4 of ADR 0005 (cited for cache_control IR-strip
  precedent)
- CC 开发铁律 v1.6 § 10.x — Round-3 Cold Audit caught all 3 items

Reviewer (Iron Rule v1.6 § 10.x Mode A, fresh-context opus, independent
of drafter): APPROVE_WITH_MINOR. Verified:
- Suite 3 + 3 plugin spawn-with-mock blocks + 3 plugin lossy-field
  header tables all present (F5 substitute test strategy claims
  match implementation)
- anthropic.mjs:196 hardcodes --output-format text + openai-to-ir.mjs
  drops cache_control from messages (F11 wire-limitation technically
  accurate)
- All 8 UNPINNED assumption labels (codex A3/A4 + mistral A4/A5/A6/A7/A8)
  match plugin header text exactly — no invention
- Anthropic-not-in-class claim verified against Provider Authority Pins
  table

Follow-up items (reviewer's non-blocking notes, NOT in this PR):

1. **mistral.mjs A5 internal disconnect** — header lines 145-156 label
   A5 as `UNPINNED-D-later-verifies`, but function body at 371-374
   already cites DeepWiki enumeration as the pin and marks A5
   `CONFIRMED-NOT-APPLICABLE` (no --model flag exists in vibe CLI).
   The disconnect predates D31 and is a per-plugin header cleanup
   (not a constitutional amendment), so it stays out of D31 scope per
   IDR. File as separate follow-up issue — A5 should be moved out of
   the Speculative-Candidate table once the header is updated.

2. **ADR 0005 Amendment ordering cosmetic** — strict reverse-chronological
   would put Amendment 5 above Amendment 4 (current order is 4, 5, 3,
   2 because both 4 and 5 share the 2026-05-24 date and 5 was inserted
   after 4). Not blocking; future cleanup if maintainers want strict
   numeric-descending.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-05-24 17:06:16 +10:00

22 KiB
Raw Blame History

OLP Alignment Constitution

Status: Active. This document is the supreme source of truth for OLP scope decisions. Conflicts with other documents (README, issues, prior commit messages, vendor documentation summaries) resolve in favor of this file.

Project: OLP (Open LLM Proxy) — a personal- and family-scale multi-provider LLM proxy that supersedes OCP (Open Claude Proxy). See docs/adr/0001-project-founding.md for the founding decision and the 2026-06-15 Anthropic billing-split trigger that motivated multi-provider scope.


Core Principle

OLP is a router-and-cache layer over a fixed set of independent provider CLIs. It spawns those CLIs, forwards traffic between them and an OpenAI-compatible HTTP entry surface, normalizes shapes via an Intermediate Representation (IR), and caches deterministically. It is not an extension layer for any provider, and it is not a model-capability router.

This Core Principle decomposes into three honesty commitments:

  1. Per-provider plugin honesty. Each provider plugin must honestly proxy the underlying provider CLI without invention. If the CLI does not perform a given operation, the plugin does not invent one.
  2. OpenAI-compat entry honesty. The /v1/chat/completions entry surface must honestly implement OpenAI's published specification without invention. If OpenAI's spec does not define a field, OLP does not invent one.
  3. IR honesty. The IR is the internal interop contract between the entry surface and provider plugins. Any extension to the IR requires an Architecture Decision Record (ADR) amendment before it ships.

OCP's constitution was anchored on a single wire authority (cli.js). OLP has multiple wire authorities, one per provider plugin, plus the OpenAI spec for the entry surface, plus the IR for internal interop. All three classes are governed uniformly by the Rules below.


Rules

The five Rules below apply to every PR touching a provider plugin, the entry surface, or the IR. They are written in the language of the multi-authority model: each Rule names the authority the change must be reconciled against.

  1. Rule 1 (Cite First). Before adding, renaming, or changing any provider invocation, request field, response field, IR field, or entry-surface behaviour, the author must identify and cite the relevant authority — the provider CLI's documentation or observed behaviour (provider plugin scope), the OpenAI /v1/chat/completions specification section (entry-surface scope), or the relevant ADR (IR scope). The citation goes in the commit message and PR body. An absent citation is itself a finding and must be declared.

  2. Rule 2 (No Invention). OLP must not introduce: (a) provider CLI flags, invocation patterns, or output-shape assumptions the underlying provider CLI does not itself support; (b) OpenAI-spec fields, parameters, or response shapes that OpenAI's /v1/chat/completions specification does not document; (c) IR fields or semantics without an ADR amendment landing in the same merge or before. Speculative "Provider X probably uses Y" or "OpenAI clients probably expect Z" statements are prohibited.

  3. Rule 3 (Match the Implementation). When proxying a provider CLI, the plugin must match its semantics on the wire it actually emits: output format, error codes, streaming chunk shape, exit-code conventions, auth artifact location. When implementing OpenAI-compat at the entry surface, OLP must match the spec wire-format. When carrying data through the IR, the IR's documented semantics are normative; provider plugins document any lossy translations. Deviations require an explicit, reviewed exception recorded in this file (Class-specific Exceptions section).

  4. Rule 4 (Unalignable Plugins / Fields Are Deleted). A provider plugin that cannot be traced to a real CLI behaviour is removed, not disabled or feature-flagged. An IR field that cannot be traced to its authorizing ADR is removed. An entry-surface field that cannot be traced to OpenAI's spec is removed. The policy is removal, not deprecation. See the Unalignable Policy section.

  5. Rule 5 (Cite in Commits). Every commit touching lib/providers/<name>.mjs must cite the provider CLI authority in the commit body. Every commit touching the entry surface must cite the OpenAI spec section URL. Every commit touching the IR must cite the authorizing ADR. CI performs a soft check for the citation pattern; reviewers enforce per CLAUDE.md.

Rule 4 exception class — Speculative-Candidate Plugin (D31 F13+F14)

Rule 4 says "unalignable plugins / fields are deleted, not feature-flagged." This sub-section formalizes a narrow exception: a plugin may ship in lib/providers/<name>.mjs with UNPINNED assumptions documented in its header IF AND ONLY IF all five of the following hold:

  1. The plugin's STATIC_REGISTRY entry is present (so the Provider contract validates at startup).
  2. The plugin is candidate: true in models-registry.json (or equivalently, the plugin's row in the Provider Inventory table below is in the Candidate Providers section, not Enabled Providers).
  3. The plugin is NOT in any user's providers.enabled config — i.e., it cannot be Enabled in any deployment. POST /v1/chat/completions returns 503 for this provider until a Phase E2E audit passes and the enabled flag is explicitly set.
  4. The plugin header contains an explicit section enumerating each speculative shape assumption with a labeled assumption-ID (e.g., A3, A4) and a planned-pin trigger (e.g., "D7 will probe via real CLI capture", "first enable will pin").
  5. The plugin's defensive multi-shape parsers (e.g., trying multiple NDJSON event field names) are tied to the UNPINNED markers — a future implementer can grep the header assumption labels to find every speculative branch and remove all but the actually-observed shape at pin time.

A plugin satisfying all five conditions is a Speculative-Candidate. It is Rule 2 / Rule 4 compliant via this exception class.

Enablement (Speculative-Candidate → Enabled) requires:

  • Removing the UNPINNED assumption labels from the header (replacing each with CONFIRMED or CONFIRMED-NOT-APPLICABLE as appropriate).
  • Replacing defensive multi-shape parsers with single-shape implementations matching the observed (now-pinned) wire format.
  • Filing a per-assumption ADR amendment or a single inclusion ADR (per ADR 0006) documenting the primary-source pin for each assumption that was UNPINNED.

Currently in this class (D31 ratification, 2026-05-24):

Plugin file Phase Labelled UNPINNED assumptions
lib/providers/codex.mjs (D6) Phase 2 A3 (auth token field name), A4 (NDJSON event schema)
lib/providers/mistral.mjs (D8) Phase 3 A4 (JSON output event schema), A5 (model flag), A6 (exact model IDs), A7 (streaming vs json output mode), A8 (stdin prompt passing)

The Anthropic plugin (lib/providers/anthropic.mjs, D4D5) is NOT in this class — its CLI authority is pinned (@anthropic-ai/claude-code v2.1.89 per the Provider Authority Pins table above). It conforms to the standard Rule 4 path.

CI enforcement note: The alignment.yml workflow does not currently enforce the Speculative-Candidate annotation requirement automatically. The five-condition check is a reviewer obligation. A future PR may add a grep-based gate requiring any file in lib/providers/ that contains the string UNPINNED to also contain the five-condition annotations. D31 establishes the class; automated enforcement is deferred.


Authorities

OLP has three concurrent authorities. Each governs a distinct scope.

Authority 1 — Per-provider CLI (provider-plugin scope)

Each provider plugin in lib/providers/<name>.mjs is governed by the underlying provider's CLI as the wire authority for that plugin. The plugin's job is to spawn the CLI and translate between its native IO and the IR.

Provider authority pins (audited at project founding 2026-05-23, re-audited annually per § Annual Audit):

Provider key Provider CLI Audit pin (TBD on Phase-1 spawn) Risk Tier (see § Risk Tier Framework)
anthropic claude -p from @anthropic-ai/claude-code inherits OCP's cli.js 2.1.89 audit pin at fork; OLP-side pin: @anthropic-ai/claude-code v2.1.89 (observed at D4 — lib/providers/anthropic.mjs header). Re-evaluate post-2026-06-15 per One-shot Triggered Audit above. D (pre-2026-06-15) / re-evaluate post-2026-06-15
openai codex exec --json from OpenAI Codex CLI Codex CLI reference page: https://developers.openai.com/codex/cli/reference (retrieved 2026-05-23 — §§ "codex exec [flags] PROMPT", "--json / --experimental-json", "--model, -m"; D6 WebFetch-verified reachable). Secondary authority: https://developers.openai.com/codex/cli/features §§ "Supported Models", "Automation". D
mistral vibe --prompt --output json from Mistral Vibe CLI Mistral Vibe terminal quickstart: https://docs.mistral.ai/mistral-vibe/terminal/quickstart (retrieved 2026-05-23 — § "--prompt flag triggers programmatic mode; --output selects format (text, json, streaming)"; D8 WebFetch-verified reachable). Configuration authority: https://docs.mistral.ai/mistral-vibe/terminal/configuration (§§ auth file ~/.vibe/.env, MISTRAL_API_KEY env var). D
grok grok -p --output-format streaming-json (xAI Build) TBD at Phase 8+ enable C
kimi kimi -p --output-format stream-json (Moonshot) TBD at Phase 8+ enable C
minimax TBD CLI command (MiniMax Token Plan) TBD at opt-in enable B
glm TBD CLI command (Zhipu Coding Plan) TBD at opt-in enable B
qwen TBD CLI command (Alibaba Coding Plan) TBD at opt-in enable B

Citation format for provider-plugin PRs: <provider> CLI <version> § <section-or-flag> (e.g., codex CLI v0.118.0 § exec --json output schema) or a direct URL into the provider's published CLI documentation. If the change is based on observed behaviour rather than published documentation, the citation states that explicitly (codex CLI v0.118.0 — observed behaviour, transcript attached).

Authority 2 — OpenAI specification (entry-surface scope)

OLP exposes a single external HTTP surface: /v1/chat/completions in OpenAI Chat Completions shape, plus a minimum administrative surface (/health, /v1/models, etc.). The OpenAI specification at https://platform.openai.com/docs/api-reference/chat is the wire authority for the entry surface.

Citation format for entry-surface PRs: OpenAI spec URL + the specific field, parameter, or behaviour. Example: OpenAI Chat Completions, response_format parameter (https://platform.openai.com/docs/api-reference/chat/create#chat-create-response_format).

The spec pin lives in docs/openai-spec-pin.md shipped as of D30 (2026-05-24); v0.1 baseline pinning the entry-surface fields OLP currently implements. Re-snapshot annually per § Annual Alignment Audit.

Authority 3 — IR contract (internal interop scope)

The IR is the lingua franca between the entry surface and provider plugins. It is documented in docs/adr/0003-intermediate-representation.md. Any IR change — adding a field, removing one, or altering semantics — is an amendment to ADR 0003 and follows the ADR amendment procedure.

Citation format for IR PRs: ADR 0003 § <section> plus the amending ADR if applicable.


Risk Tier Framework

Provider inclusion / exclusion is governed by a four-tier risk model. The full rationale lives in ADR 0006 (Provider Inclusion / Exclusion Criteria).

Tier Meaning OLP treatment
A — vendor AI-platform-wide enforcement + explicit named prohibition + poor cost/benefit Excluded by default. Not bundled, not pluggable, not added via opt-in. Cannot be re-included unless ADR 0006 is superseded/amended with new primary-source evidence.
B — service-level key revocation; vendor may extend across AI services Optional tier 2. Default-disabled. Requires one-time explicit consent prompt on enable. README documents the policy clause and realistic revocation outcome.
C — tightening signal; no documented enforcement history Optional tier 1. Default-disabled. Opt-in via config without consent prompt.
D — permissive / safe Eligible for default-enabled once the provider transitions from Candidate to Enabled (see Provider Inventory below).

A vendor's documented ToS, FAQ language naming third-party proxy tools, observable enforcement history, and subscription cost/benefit jointly determine tier. Re-classification requires an ADR 0006 amendment. Tier classification alone does not auto-enable a provider — see the Candidate/Enabled split in Provider Inventory.


Provider Inventory (v1.0)

OLP distinguishes Candidate Providers (declared in this constitution as intended for inclusion, but not yet authority-pinned) from Enabled Providers (authority pin filled, plugin landed, Phase audit passed; eligible for default-enabled or opt-in installation).

The v0.1 founding commit ships zero Enabled Providers. This is intentional: a constitution that names a provider as "default-enabled" while its CLI version, output shape, auth artifact, and exit-code semantics are still TBD violates Rules 1 (Cite First) and 3 (Match the Implementation). Enablement is a Phase audit deliverable, not a bootstrap claim.

Enabled Providers

Provider key Tier Default state Authority pin Inclusion source
(none at v0.1 founding — populated as Phase audits land)

A provider transitions from Candidate to Enabled only when all three of the following hold:

  1. Its row in the Authority pin table (Authorities § 1 above) is filled with a real CLI version + observed-behaviour transcript or docs URL — no TBD.
  2. Its plugin lands in lib/providers/<name>.mjs per ADR 0002, conforming to the v1.0 Provider contract.
  3. A Phase audit per spec §6 reports passing E2E for that provider (smoke against /v1/chat/completions round-trip + cache hit/miss + fallback chain entry).

Candidate Providers

Provider key Anticipated Tier Anticipated Phase Inclusion source
anthropic D (re-eval post-2026-06-15) Phase 1 ADR 0001 § Mission inheritance; ADR 0006
openai D Phase 2 ADR 0006
mistral D Phase 3 ADR 0006
grok C Phase 8+ ADR 0006
kimi C Phase 8+ ADR 0006
minimax B Phase 8+ ADR 0006
glm B Phase 8+ ADR 0006
qwen B Phase 8+ ADR 0006

Excluded by default (Tier A candidate): Google Antigravity. See ADR 0006 for the rationale, currently classified as evidence-backed exclusion pending primary-source pin — the Google FAQ language reportedly naming OpenClaw / OpenCode / Claude Code as prohibited is cited from secondary reports (VentureBeat, piunikaweb, The Register, OpenClaw issue #14203); a primary-source URL or archival snapshot is a follow-up audit task. Until the primary source is pinned, the Tier A classification rests on secondary evidence — sufficient for default-not-bundled, but not yet sufficient for "permanent" in the constitutional sense. Re-inclusion requires an ADR 0006 amendment with primary-source evidence either confirming or contradicting the current secondary picture.


Unalignable Policy

A change is unalignable if, after a good-faith search, it cannot be mapped to:

  • a specific provider CLI flag, documented behaviour, or observed transcript (provider-plugin scope), or
  • a specific OpenAI specification section (entry-surface scope), or
  • an existing or co-merged ADR (IR scope).

Unalignable changes are deleted, not disabled, not feature-flagged, not deprecated.

Burden of proof is on the change author. Audit findings that cannot be reconciled trigger an immediate deletion PR. There is no grandfathering for OLP — the project is new and inherits no legacy contracts.

If a user workflow appears to depend on an unalignable behaviour, the correct remediations are: (a) upstream the behaviour into the relevant provider's CLI (engage that vendor), (b) propose an OpenAI-spec extension and wait for adoption, (c) write an ADR authorizing a new IR field, or (d) move the behaviour out of OLP into a separate tool. OLP does not retain it.


One-shot Triggered Audits

In addition to the recurring 14 May audit below, the following one-shot audits are scheduled and must complete on their named trigger:

  • 2026-06-16 (or first Anthropic Agent SDK Credit billing-cycle close, whichever is later) — verify the post-2026-06-15 Anthropic billing-split behaviour matches the spec §2 assumption: programmatic claude -p traffic is metered against the separate Agent SDK Credit pool, not Plan limits. Update the Anthropic Authority pin row above with the observed behaviour, update ADR 0006 with the post-effective-date Tier re-evaluation, and append a Decision-log entry to the spec §10. If observed behaviour diverges from the spec assumption (e.g., Plan limits still apply, or credit pool meter differs from $100/Max5x/month), file a Risk-Tier reclassification per ADR 0006 amendment procedure.

  • Antigravity primary-source pin (open-ended, no deadline) — find a primary-source URL or archival snapshot for the Google FAQ language naming OpenClaw / OpenCode / Claude Code as prohibited. Pin the URL + retrieval timestamp into ADR 0006. If the primary source cannot be located within 90 days of this commit and only secondary reports remain, file an ADR 0006 amendment proposing a re-classification (Tier A may need to soften to Tier C "evidence-backed signal only" if the prohibition cannot be primary-sourced).

  • OpenAI Codex ToS formal pin (trigger: Phase 2 E2E enable for Codex, OR 2026-12-31, whichever comes first) — ADR 0006 § Classification table row "OpenAI Codex" currently relies on Codex GitHub Discussion #8338 (maintainer posture: "I'm an engineer, not a lawyer") as the authority pin, which is a maintainer statement of permissive intent rather than a formal ToS blessing. Before Codex transitions from Candidate to Enabled (Phase 2 E2E audit), locate and pin a primary-source ToS URL or official OpenAI policy document that explicitly addresses third-party CLI proxying. If no such document exists by 2026-12-31, file an ADR 0006 amendment documenting the absence as the formal conclusion of this audit task. Update ADR 0006 § Classification table row "OpenAI Codex" with the audit outcome.


Annual Alignment Audit

  • Date: 14 May each year (the anniversary of the Anthropic 2026-05-14 announcement, which is the structural trigger for OLP).
  • Scope (per-provider plugin): For each enabled provider, re-audit the provider CLI version against the pin in the Authorities table above. Re-verify that every spawn invocation, flag, and output-parser expectation in lib/providers/<name>.mjs still matches that CLI version's actual behaviour. Update the pin row in this file.
  • Scope (entry surface): Snapshot OpenAI's /v1/chat/completions specification and diff against the pin in docs/openai-spec-pin.md ( v0.1 baseline shipped D30). For each field OLP implements, verify the spec still defines it the same way. Update the pin.
  • Scope (IR): Diff the IR documented in ADR 0003 against the implementation in lib/ir/. Any drift triggers an amendment or a deletion PR.
  • Scope (Risk Tier reclassifications): For each provider, re-evaluate the risk tier against current ToS, FAQ language, and observed enforcement events from the past year. Reclassifications land as ADR 0006 amendments.
  • Output: A signed audit note committed to docs/alignment-audits/YYYY-05-14.md (📋 docs/alignment-audits/ directory does not exist yet; it is created when the first audit is conducted). Inline pin updates go into this file.
  • Failure mode: Any finding that cannot be reconciled triggers an immediate deletion PR per the Unalignable Policy.

Class-specific Exceptions

(none at project founding)

Any future Rule 3 deviation lands here as a numbered exception with PR link, reviewer, and rationale.


Amendment Procedure

This constitution is amended only by a PR that (a) cites the evidence motivating the amendment, (b) is reviewed by an independent reviewer per CC Iron Rule 10, and (c) updates the relevant ADR if the amendment is structural. Amendments never retroactively legitimize previously unalignable changes.


Reference: How OCP's cli.js discipline maps to OLP

OLP did not abandon OCP's discipline — it generalized it. The mapping:

OCP concept OLP equivalent
cli.js as single golden reference Per-provider CLI as authority for that plugin; OpenAI spec as authority for entry surface; IR contract as authority for internal interop
"Grep cli.js before touching server.mjs" "Cite the relevant provider CLI doc or behaviour before touching that provider's plugin; cite OpenAI spec before touching the entry surface; cite the relevant ADR before touching the IR"
Class A / Class B endpoint discipline Per-provider plugin scope + entry-surface scope + IR amendment process — each scope has its own citation requirement
cli.js:NNNN citation format <provider> CLI <version> § <section> (provider) / OpenAI spec URL + field (entry) / ADR NNNN § <section> (IR)
Single ALIGNMENT.md governing one CLI One ALIGNMENT.md governing many CLIs uniformly via the plugin contract
2026-04-11 drift lesson Inherited as institutional memory; no OLP-side incident yet. The blacklist in .github/workflows/alignment.yml carries the OCP-era token forward as a transitive guardrail.

Authors: project maintainer (with AI drafting assistance). First committed: 2026-05-23 with the OLP repo bootstrap PR.