* docs: D43-A — Phase 2 doc alignment (no code change)
Phase 1 was closed at v0.1.1 (multi-provider proxy core + pre-Phase-2
cleanup, D35-D42). This commit aligns documentation surfaces to the
Phase 2 reality before D43-B (ADR 0007 multi-key auth design draft) lands.
Pure doc cleanup — no .mjs / no tests / 4 files touched.
- CLAUDE.md release_kit.phase_rolling_mode:
* current_phase: Phase 1 → Phase 2
* current_pre_release_identifier: "0.1.0-bootstrap" → "0.2.0-phase2"
- README.md:
* Status header now reads "v0.1.1 shipped (2026-05-25); Phase 2 in progress"
* Implementation Status dated 2026-05-25; intro paragraph reflects Phase 1
close + Phase 2 active
* lib/keys.mjs row: "📋 Planned (Phase 2)" → "📋 Phase 2 active per ADR 0007
(drafting at D43-B)"
* Known limitations "Multi-key auth not yet implemented" note updated
* Phase plan rewritten end-to-end: the original v0.1 spec planned one
plugin per phase, but actual execution bundled the three Tier-D plugins
+ cache + fallback into a single Phase 1 milestone (v0.1.0+v0.1.1).
New plan: Phase 0 ✅ / Phase 1 ✅ / Phase 2 multi-key auth (current) /
Phase 3 dashboard / Phase 4+ v1.x roadmap / Phase N tier-2 opt-in.
- AGENTS.md § Key files to know:
* lib/keys.mjs marker updated
* Implementation-status-note dated 2026-05-25; reflects v0.1.1 close +
Phase 2 active scope
- CHANGELOG.md Unreleased: D43-A entry recording the alignment per
CLAUDE.md release_kit overlay phase_rolling_mode discipline.
Authority: CLAUDE.md release_kit overlay phase_rolling_mode — under
Unreleased; Phase 2 kickoff handoff at
~/.cc-rules/memory/handoffs/2026-05-25-phase-2-kickoff.md (committed in
cc-rules d9da966); ADR 0007 forthcoming at D43-B.
Test count: 468 → 468 (npm test verified locally before commit).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
* docs: D43-A fold-in — ALIGNMENT.md phase terminology note (reviewer P2)
Fresh-context sonnet reviewer (PR #18) flagged P2: ALIGNMENT.md uses
"Phase 2"/"Phase 3" at lines ~58/~143-144/~179 with the original
per-plugin enablement meaning (Phase 2 = Codex enable, Phase 3 = Mistral
enable), conflicting with the new README phase plan rewritten by D43-A
where Phase 2 means multi-key auth.
Reviewer's recommended minimal fix (B1): add a clarifying note in
ALIGNMENT.md § Provider Inventory header explaining the dual usage,
rather than amend the tables or audit trigger wording. This keeps D43-A
within "pure doc cleanup" scope.
- ALIGNMENT.md § Provider Inventory: one-paragraph "Note on phase
terminology" inserted between the v0.1 zero-Enabled-Providers
rationale and the Enabled Providers table. No Speculative-Candidate
table change, no audit-trigger wording change, no governance-text
change.
- CHANGELOG.md Unreleased D43-A entry: ALIGNMENT.md added to the file
list with a one-line explanation referencing the reviewer-P2 fold-in.
Test count: 468 → 468 (npm test verified locally after fold-in; no test
file touched).
Authority: PR #18 fresh-context reviewer finding P2; CLAUDE.md release_kit
overlay phase_rolling_mode — under Unreleased.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
---------
Co-authored-by: dtzp555 <dtzp555@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
9.1 KiB
@AGENTS.md @~/.cc-rules/AGENTS.md
OLP Project Session Instructions
WARNING — READ BEFORE WRITING ANY CODE IN THIS REPO
Before touching any provider plugin (
lib/providers/*.mjs), the entry surface (server.mjsrequest handlers), or the IR (lib/ir/*), read./ALIGNMENT.mdin full. The constitution is binding. Non-compliant commits are reverted.
Before starting any task
- Read
./ALIGNMENT.md. Internalize the five Rules and the three-authority model (per-provider CLI / OpenAI spec / IR contract). - Run
/dev-start <task description>to get a pre-flight plan that incorporates the iron rules,SKILL_ROUTING.md, this file, andALIGNMENT.md. - Locate the provider authority before drafting any code:
- Provider-plugin change → identify the provider CLI documentation page or observed behaviour you are matching, and pin the CLI version.
- Entry-surface change → identify the OpenAI
/v1/chat/completionsspec section and URL. - IR change → identify the ADR you are amending or co-merging. No code is written ahead of the authority citation.
Hard requirements for plugin / server.mjs / IR changes
Every PR that modifies a provider plugin, the entry surface in server.mjs, or the IR in lib/ir/ must satisfy all three of the following. A PR missing any one of them is blocked from merge.
- Authority citation. The commit message and PR body declare the relevant authority and citation:
- Provider plugin →
<provider> CLI <version> § <section-or-flag>plus URL or transcript reference. - Entry surface → OpenAI spec URL plus the specific field, parameter, or behaviour.
- IR →
ADR NNNN § <section>(and the amending ADR if applicable). If the underlying authority does not perform the operation, the PR must state this explicitly and justify scope underALIGNMENT.mdRule 2 (in practice, this almost always means the PR should be closed).
- Provider plugin →
- CI
alignment.ymlpass. The workflow must pass. It greps for known-hallucinated tokens, validatesmodels-registry.json, and soft-checks per-provider commit citations. New blacklist tokens are added via PR amendment toalignment.yml; removing entries requires anALIGNMENT.mdamendment PR. Do not suppress the workflow. - Independent reviewer (Iron Rule 10). The implementation author may not self-approve. A separate reviewer — human or a subagent spawned with a fresh context — must read the diff, open the cited authority (provider CLI doc / OpenAI spec / ADR), and explicitly confirm the citation. A review comment that does not confirm the authority was checked is not a valid approval.
Iron rules in force
This repo operates under the CC Development Iron Rules (CC 开发铁律) v1.4. Three rules are load-bearing for OLP work:
- Iron Rule 10 (Code Review). Every implementation phase has an independent reviewer. Self-review does not count. See hard requirement #3 above.
- Iron Rule 11 (Incremental Diff Review). Non-trivial work is split into the minimum reviewable unit — one PR per layer per severity.
ALIGNMENT.md, this file, the PR template, and the CI workflows are shipped as a single constitutional PR (one layer: governance). Subsequent layers (plugin loader, individual provider plugins, IR serializers, cache layer, fallback engine, dashboard) each land as their own PR. - Iron Rule 12 (Pre-Brainstorm Prior-Art Search). Before proposing any new IR field, fallback trigger, or provider plugin, search the relevant provider's docs, OpenAI's spec, the local
docs/adr/, and the cross-machine~/.cc-rules/memory/learnings/. The provider-specific search is the decisive one: if the provider CLI does not perform the operation, Rule 2 of the constitution applies.
The full iron rules are at ~/.claude/CC_DEV_IRON_RULES.md (symlinked from the cc-rules repo on the maintainer's workstations). Load them into session context with /cc-rules when needed.
Skills relevant to this repo
/dev-start— pre-flight planning, always first for non-trivial tasks./cc-rules— load the iron rules into context./agent-dispatch— pick the correct model (opus for design and review, sonnet for straightforward edits, haiku for mechanical chores) before spawning any subagent./cc-mem search <keyword>— look up cross-machine memory for prior decisions, especially provider-policy events and CLI-version migrations.
Commit message conventions
- Subject line uses Conventional Commits (
fix:,feat:,docs:,refactor:,chore:). - Provider-plugin commits include the citation pattern
<provider> CLI <version>or a direct provider docs URL in the body. CI performs a soft check. - Entry-surface commits include an OpenAI spec URL.
- IR commits cite the authorizing or amending ADR.
- Any assertion of the form "Provider X uses Y" in the body must be immediately followed by a citation (CLI version + section, or docs URL, or observed-transcript reference). CI soft-checks the pattern.
- Co-author trailer is required for LLM-assisted commits (
Co-Authored-By: Claude <model> <noreply@anthropic.com>).
Project-level escalation
If a design decision cannot be resolved by reference to the relevant authority (provider CLI / OpenAI spec / ADR) and ALIGNMENT.md, escalate to the project maintainer via /cc-chat rather than guessing. Silent guessing is what produced OCP's 2026-04-11 drift; OLP inherits that institutional lesson and does not repeat it.
Release kit overlay (CC 开发铁律 第五律 5.5)
This project's overlay per iron rule v1.4's 5.5. Machine-checkable declaration.
release_kit:
version_source: package.json
changelog: CHANGELOG.md
release_channel:
type: github-release
tag_format: v{semver}
auto_create_on_tag_push: true # via .github/workflows/release.yml
docs_source: README.md
resource_lists:
- name: Supported Providers table
location: README.md § "Supported Providers"
source_of_truth: models-registry.json
- name: Routing chains table
location: README.md § "Configuration"
- name: API Endpoints table
location: README.md § "API Endpoints"
- name: Environment Variables table
location: README.md § "Environment Variables"
new_feature_doc_expectations:
- new provider plugin → README § "Supported Providers" entry + ADR 0006 inclusion entry + risk-tier classification
- new fallback trigger → README § "Configuration" + tests in test-features.mjs
- new IR field → ADR 0003 amendment + README impact note (if user-visible)
- new env var → README § "Environment Variables" table
- new endpoint → README § "API Endpoints" table + relevant Config / Troubleshooting §
- new auto-sync / hook → dedicated §, must document trigger + manual invocation + opt-out + any bootstrap quirk
- new file / SPOT / schema → Architecture or contributor § with link
bootstrap_quirk_policy:
- any first-run migration quirk (e.g., from OCP) → README § "Troubleshooting" + scripts/migrate-from-ocp.mjs if applicable
# NOTE: scripts/migrate-from-ocp.mjs is planned (Phase 7), not yet authored. The scripts/ directory
# does not currently exist. References here are forward-looking; do not attempt to run this script.
phase_rolling_mode:
# Iron Rule 5 (release-kit version bump before push) applies at Phase boundaries,
# NOT to individual D-day commits within a Phase.
#
# Rationale: OLP Phase 1 is a single cohesive deliverable (boot layer + provider
# plugins + cache + fallback engine + hardening). Bumping a version tag for every
# D-day push would produce 30+ noise tags with no user-facing semantic boundary.
# ADR 0005 § "Cache key stability" requires that key composition is stable across
# a release; mid-phase tag churn would falsely signal stability windows.
#
# Policy:
# - While a Phase is in progress, individual D-day pushes land under "Unreleased"
# in CHANGELOG.md. package.json stays at the Phase-N pre-release identifier
# (e.g. "0.1.0-bootstrap" during Phase 1 boot; the token may be updated to
# "0.1.0-phase1" once Phase 1 implementation starts landing).
# - The version bump + git tag fires at Phase CLOSE — a dedicated "Phase N close"
# PR that bumps package.json, promotes "Unreleased" to the release version in
# CHANGELOG.md, and triggers .github/workflows/release.yml via the tag push.
# - The Phase close PR is triggered explicitly by the project maintainer; it is
# NOT automatic. No automated tooling bumps the version.
# - Cross-Phase discipline: if D-day work touches a boundary already tagged (e.g.
# a hotfix to a shipped Phase N deliverable), follow Iron Rule 5 normally — bump
# patch, tag, release before pushing.
#
# This overlay is the authoritative source. If Iron Rule 5 appears to be silently
# violated (no version bump after many D-day pushes), check this section first
# before filing a compliance finding.
current_phase: Phase 2
current_pre_release_identifier: "0.2.0-phase2"
phase_close_trigger: explicit maintainer action (not automated)