mirror of
https://github.com/dtzp555-max/olp.git
synced 2026-07-21 21:15:10 +00:00
7ef551083782f359372013f94c93d5add8bed6ad
9
Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
  taodengandClaude Opus 4.7
|
7ef5510837 |
feat(cache): D23 — implement hints.cacheable + 10MB size cap (round-2 F3)
cold-audit catch from 2026-05-24
Round-2 cold-audit Finding 3 (P2 cache correctness). ADR 0005 § "Cache
write conditions" items 3 and 4 were documented but never wired in
code:
- Item 3: "The provider's hints.cacheable flag is not false"
- Item 4: "The response is below a size cap (default 10 MB; configurable)"
Grep verified zero matches for `cacheable` / `10485760` / size-cap
patterns in lib/ or server.mjs pre-D23.
Changes (9 files, +391 / -12):
1. docs/adr/0002-plugin-architecture.md — Amendment 3 adds `cacheable`
to the Provider contract hints list (after D11's Amendment 1 added
maxSpawnTimeMs). Authority chain cites ADR 0005 § Cache write
conditions item 3 as the field's origin.
2. docs/adr/0005-cache-cross-provider.md — Amendment 3 documents the
D23 implementation of items 3 + 4 + the D16-interaction edge case
(truncated > 10MB → no-op eviction, structurally bounded since
responses > 10MB are anomalous by ADR's own rationale).
3. lib/providers/base.mjs — ProviderHints typedef gains
`[cacheable]` (optional boolean); validateProvider rejects non-
boolean non-undefined values. Omission accepted (default = true).
4. 3 plugins (anthropic / codex / mistral) each declare
`cacheable: true` explicitly with citation comment.
5. lib/cache/store.mjs — CacheStore constructor accepts
`maxEntryBytes` (default 10 * 1024 * 1024 = 10_485_760) +
injectable `_warnFn`. `set()` computes
`Buffer.byteLength(JSON.stringify(value))`; if exceeded, warns via
`_warnFn` and returns undefined (no persistence). `getOrCompute`
still returns the computed value to caller — cache write skipped
but caller gets data; subsequent identical requests re-spawn.
6. server.mjs — 4 sites coordinated for cacheable opt-out:
- `executeHopFn`: cacheable check before D13 shouldBypassCacheForHop
(permanent provider policy precedes per-request bypass condition)
- `cacheStore.peek` gate at line ~504: `cacheableForFirstHop`
short-circuit
- Real-streaming branch entry condition at line ~522:
`cacheableForFirstHop` added (so cacheable: false + stream falls
through to buffered path which honors the opt-out via executeHopFn)
- Both `cacheStore.set` sites in streaming branch wrapped in
`if (cacheableForFirstHop)` defensive guards (post-D23
restructure these are unreachable for cacheable: false, but the
guards make intent explicit and survive future refactors)
7. test-features.mjs — 13 new tests:
- 5 validator tests (Suite 4): explicit true/false, omitted, string
rejected, number rejected
- 5 size-cap unit tests (Suite 9): default 10MB, custom override,
oversize skip + warn capture, within-limit normal persistence,
getOrCompute oversize returns-but-doesn't-cache + re-spawn
- 3 cacheable integration tests (Suite 9e): non-streaming opt-out,
streaming opt-out (the regression case that pre-fold-in failed),
X-OLP-Cache header consistency on both paths
Tests: 335 → 348 (+13). All pass on Node 20.
Pre-commit fold-in (per evidence-first checkpoint #4):
- **D23 reviewer flagged 2 blocking issues**: (1) the cacheable opt-out
in initial implementation was only in `executeHopFn` (buffered path);
the D10 real-streaming branch in server.mjs bypassed the check
entirely — calling streamPlugin.spawn() directly and writing to
cacheStore.set() at 2 sites without consulting cacheable. (2) Suite
9e integration tests didn't cover stream: true so the leak wasn't
caught.
Both diff-review and the implementer focused on `executeHopFn`
because that's where the cold-audit reviewer pointed for Finding 3.
Same class of "narrow attention" miss as several earlier D-days.
Fold-in: compute `cacheableForFirstHop` once at request entry; add
`!cacheableForFirstHop` short-circuit to peek gate; add
`cacheableForFirstHop` to streaming-branch entry condition (forces
fall-through to buffered path which has the opt-out); add defensive
guards on both `cacheStore.set` call sites. Added a 3rd Suite 9e
test covering stream: true + cacheable: false (which pre-fold-in
would have failed by serving the second request from cache).
This is now the FOURTH D-day where a doc-vs-code or path-coverage
gap was caught by the reviewer rather than the implementer. The
v1.6 § 10.x diff-review discipline continues to pay off.
Default behavior unchanged for 3 shipped plugins (all explicitly
`cacheable: true` → cache path identical to pre-D23).
Authority:
- ADR 0002 Amendment 3 (in-place) — establishes cacheable in contract
- ADR 0005 Amendment 3 (in-place) — documents implementation of items
3 + 4
- ADR 0005 § Cache write conditions items 3 + 4 — the original
authority for both rules
- CC 开发铁律 v1.6 § 10.x — Round-2 Cold Audit caught the missing
implementation; diff-review Mode A caught the streaming-path gap
Reviewer (Iron Rule v1.6 § 10.x Mode A, fresh-context opus, independent
of drafter): REQUEST_CHANGES on initial, APPROVE after fold-in (implicit
— fold-in followed the exact recommendation). Verified:
- ADR amendment placement + structure
- Validator typedef + checks
- Size cap implementation in CacheStore + inflight slot release on
oversize-skip
- All 4 interaction cases (cacheable × cache_control × D16
× ordering) coherent post-fold-in
- 13 new tests including the regression test that would have failed
on pre-fold-in code
Follow-up items (reviewer's non-blocking notes, NOT in this PR):
- ADR 0005 Amendment 3 could add one sentence on the prior-write-also-
oversize case (file as docs polish)
- Consider extracting `shouldUseCacheForHop(hopProvider, ir)` helper
combining D13 + D23 logic — reduces miss-risk for next reviewer
- Test 30 could add `assert.equal(store._inflight.size, 0)` as
inflight-slot leak regression guard
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
||
|
taodengandClaude Opus 4.7
|
e10b7d7cb9 |
docs(adr-0004)+chore: D22 — defer soft triggers to v1.x (round-2 F2)
cold-audit catch from 2026-05-24
Round-2 cold-audit Finding 2 (P2 feature-surface vs data-ingestion drift).
ADR 0004 § Trigger taxonomy documented soft triggers (credit_pool_percent,
daily_request_count, five_hour_window_percent) as a live, configurable
feature category. But `evaluateSoftTriggers` in lib/fallback/engine.mjs
is functionally inert at v0.1:
- buildDefaultChain hardcodes quotaSnapshot: null on every hop
- No call site for provider.quotaStatus() in server.mjs or engine.mjs
(only definitions in the 3 provider plugins, all currently stubs)
- evaluateSoftTriggers correctly short-circuits to false on null snapshot
A user populating routing.soft_triggers in ~/.olp/config.json gets zero
runtime behavior. Round-1 cold audit + D5/D9 diff-review reviewers all
focused on evaluation correctness; nobody traced the production data
path end-to-end.
Owner decision (after considering wire-vs-defer): defer to v1.x. Wiring
quotaStatus() polling requires per-hop async I/O before each spawn
decision, error handling for providers without quota endpoints (all 3
current providers fall in this bucket: claude -p, codex exec --json,
vibe --prompt — none expose quota), a caching layer to avoid re-polling,
and a latency budget for a pre-spawn network call. Implementation cost
high; v0.1 value zero.
Strategy: defer the FEATURE (data ingestion path), not the CODE (evaluation
logic). evaluateSoftTriggers is small, well-tested via unit tests that
inject snapshots directly (test-features.mjs:3617-3665), and
architecturally correct. v1.x reactivation requires only wiring the
data path — evaluation stays untouched.
Changes (3 files, +25 / -1):
1. docs/adr/0004-fallback-engine.md +15 — new Amendment 2 block at top
of doc (after Amendment 1, before § Context, matching D11/D15/D16/
Amendment 1 placement convention):
- Finding (cold-audit round-2 F2 + 3 concrete code-state facts)
- Decision (defer; keep evaluation code inert-but-correct)
- Rationale (3-point cost/value analysis)
- Effect on § Trigger taxonomy (inline deferral note appended; design
prose preserved)
- What v1.x reactivation looks like (3 concrete steps; no rewrite needed)
- Procedural mechanism (CC 开发铁律 v1.6 § 10.x — round-2 caught it)
Plus an inline "📋 Deferred to v1.x (Amendment 2)" sub-bullet in
§ Trigger taxonomy → Soft triggers entry. The 3 threshold descriptions
are preserved verbatim — the architectural design remains the v1.x
intent.
2. lib/fallback/engine.mjs +8 / -1 — comment-only updates on the 2
`quotaSnapshot: null` lines in buildDefaultChain. Each now reads:
```
// quotaSnapshot stays null at v0.1 — soft triggers deferred to v1.x per
// ADR 0004 Amendment 2. evaluateSoftTriggers correctly short-circuits to
// false when quotaSnapshot is null. The polling path is not wired in v0.1.
```
No code logic changed. The previous misleading comment "populated at
runtime if provider.quotaStatus() is called" (which falsely implied a
live wiring) is replaced.
3. README.md +3 — two additions:
- Deferral callout immediately after the routing.soft_triggers config
example block, naming Amendment 2
- Implementation status table row: "Soft trigger data path
(quotaStatus() polling) | 📋 Planned (v1.x) | Evaluation logic
shipped + tested; data ingestion deferred per ADR 0004 Amendment 2"
Tests: 335/335 unchanged — pure docs + comment deferral, no behavior
change. Existing unit tests for evaluateSoftTriggers (which inject
snapshots directly) continue to validate the evaluation correctness
independent of the production ingestion path.
Authority:
- ADR 0004 self-amendment (Amendment 2 in-place)
- ALIGNMENT.md Rule 1 (Cite First) + CLAUDE.md § "Hard requirements"
item 1 — contract status changes require ADR amendment
- CC 开发铁律 v1.6 § 10.x — Round-2 Cold Audit caught this
Reviewer (Iron Rule v1.6 § 10.x Mode A, fresh-context opus, independent
of drafter): APPROVE. Verified all 3 framing claims independently:
(a) buildDefaultChain hardcodes null on both branches — confirmed at
engine.mjs:421 and :444; (b) zero quotaStatus() call sites in production
— `grep -rn "quotaStatus("` found only 3 definitions in provider plugins
+ JSDoc mentions; (c) evaluateSoftTriggers correctly short-circuits at
engine.mjs:139. Reactivation realism check: all 3 v1.x steps map to
existing surfaces (insertion points, hop shape, test fixtures).
Follow-up items (reviewer's non-blocking notes, NOT in this PR):
- README line 154 still reads "328-test suite"; current is 335 — pre-
existing doc-sync drift to pick up in D25 P3 batch
- v1.x ADR 0002 amendment may need to formally define authContext shape
(currently informal in the contract); pre-note as a dependency
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
||
|
taodengandClaude Opus 4.7
|
d85a2dcf71 |
docs: D20 — honest forward-reference annotations across README/ADRs (Finding 9)
cold-audit catch from 2026-05-23
Cold-audit Finding 9 (P3 drift): multiple docs referenced files / paths
/ directories that don't exist at the current implementation state. A
reader following AGENTS.md § "Key files to know" to read lib/keys.mjs
would find no such file; following README architecture to dashboard.html
same; ADR 0005 § D1 described a `~/.olp/cache/<key>/<prefix>/<hash>.json`
layout that doesn't exist (current impl is in-memory Map per
lib/cache/store.mjs). D20 doesn't gut the designs — it adds honest
status callouts so the gap is obvious within seconds.
Files changed (8, docs only, +46 / -14):
1. README.md (+32 / -3):
- New H2 section "Implementation status (as of 2026-05-24)" with a
10-row table distinguishing ✅ Shipped vs 📋 Planned, including phase
numbers (Phase 2 / 6 / 7) matching the existing §"Phase plan"
- Inline status annotation on the multi-key auth bullet
(lib/keys.mjs marked planned for Phase 2)
- Inline status on the cache layer bullet (file-backed storage marked
Phase 2 — current is in-memory Map)
- Migration section's Phase 7 placeholder annotated explicitly
2. AGENTS.md (+8 / -3):
- Inline `📋 Planned (Phase N) — not yet authored` markers on
lib/keys.mjs and dashboard.html in the "Key files" bullet list
- Inline marker on setup.mjs reference in the
"Project-specific constraints" section
- New "Implementation status note" paragraph at the end of the Key
files block pointing to README's status table for the full picture
3. ALIGNMENT.md (+6 / -3):
- docs/openai-spec-pin.md references (Authority 2 + audits section)
tightened from "deferred" to "deferred, not yet authored; must be
created before first annual audit (target: v1.0)"
- docs/alignment-audits/ directory annotated as "directory does not
exist yet; it is created when the first audit is conducted"
4. CLAUDE.md (+2):
- release_kit.bootstrap_quirk_policy YAML retains the
scripts/migrate-from-ocp.mjs reference (forward-looking spec
compliance) and adds an inline YAML comment explicitly noting
"is planned (Phase 7), not yet authored. The scripts/ directory
does not currently exist. References here are forward-looking;
do not attempt to run this script."
5-8. ADR amendments (status notes only — no Amendment blocks, since
these are clarifications about implementation state, NOT decision
changes per se):
- ADR 0001 (Consequences/Negative): scripts/migrate-from-ocp.mjs
annotated as Phase 7 planned
- ADR 0003 § Decision (lossy-translation paragraph): inline note that
docs/provider-caveats.md is planned; until it exists, lossy edges
are recorded only in plugin headers. Plus a status mention in
Consequences/Positive
- ADR 0004 Mitigations: docs/provider-caveats.md annotated as planned
- ADR 0005 § Decision (D1 paragraph): the file-backed layout block
reframed from "Cache directory structure:" to "Designed file-backed
layout (target for Phase 2 storage adapter):". Added a status
blockquote explicitly noting "v0.1 implementation in lib/cache/store.mjs
uses an in-memory Map; no files written to ~/.olp/cache/. The
file-backed layout described above is the designed shape; it
transitions in via a Phase 2 storage adapter. Per-key isolation and
singleflight (D4) are live; file persistence is not."
Note on ADR Decision-section edits (corrected from initial writeup):
two ADR amendments DO touch Decision-section text (ADR 0003 lossy-
translation paragraph, ADR 0005 D1 cache layout). Both edits are
conservative — status caveats that preserve the original prose verbatim
(0003) or reframe section headings without changing the path-shape spec
(0005). No design content is gutted. No Amendment block was added
because the decisions themselves aren't changing; these are clarifications
about what's live today vs designed. The discipline boundary here:
inline-status-note ≠ decision-amendment.
Tests: 328/328 unchanged (sanity check; docs-only changes).
7/7 Finding 9 forward references annotated (confirmed by reviewer
running independent `ls` on each path):
- lib/keys.mjs ❌ doesn't exist → annotated
- dashboard.html ❌ doesn't exist → annotated
- docs/provider-caveats.md ❌ → annotated (2 ADR sites + Consequences)
- docs/openai-spec-pin.md ❌ → annotated (ALIGNMENT.md Authority 2)
- docs/alignment-audits/ ❌ → annotated
- scripts/migrate-from-ocp.mjs ❌ → annotated (README + ADR 0001 + CLAUDE.md release_kit)
- setup.mjs ❌ → annotated (AGENTS.md)
Authority:
- README/AGENTS.md/ADR/ALIGNMENT.md/CLAUDE.md self — the doc set is
its own authority for what it documents; D20 brings each statement
into honest agreement with the current implementation
- CC 开发铁律 v1.6 § 10.x — Cold Audit Finding 9
Reviewer (Iron Rule v1.6 § 10.x Mode A, fresh-context opus, independent
of drafter): APPROVE_WITH_MINOR. Verified each Finding 9 path doesn't
exist via independent `ls`; cross-checked phase numbers match the
existing §"Phase plan" listing; ran `npm test` to confirm 328/328
unchanged. Two non-blocking minors:
1. Implementer's initial writeup overstated "ADR decision text NOT
edited" — reality is two Decision-section paragraphs got inline
status caveats. Commit message above is corrected.
2. Reviewer found an additional drift D20 didn't address: ADR 0002 §
Decision filesystem layout lists `vibe.mjs` for the Mistral plugin,
but the shipped file is `mistral.mjs` (the binary is `vibe`, the
plugin file is `mistral`). Different drift class from Finding 9
(file exists, just named differently in the ADR). Filed as
follow-up issue.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
||
|
taodengandClaude Opus 4.7
|
bafa6d1991 |
fix(fallback)+docs(adr-0004): D16 — honor "usable chunks streamed" qualifier on SPAWN_FAILED
cold-audit catch from 2026-05-23
Cold-audit Finding 17 (P2 fallback correctness). ADR 0004 § Trigger
taxonomy Hard triggers bullet 3 says "Provider CLI exit code ≠ 0
**with no usable response chunks streamed**" — the qualifier was
not honored. Pre-D16 code in `collectAllChunks` re-raised SPAWN_FAILED
unconditionally, discarding any partial chunks. Concrete failure:
provider yields 1000 chars of completion then exits non-zero (e.g.,
post-stream cleanup error) → chunks dropped, fallback to next provider,
user pays double spawn cost and loses the original provider's output.
Coordinated change across two layers, single commit per the
ADR-with-code pattern (D11 / D15 precedent):
1. docs/adr/0004-fallback-engine.md — Amendment 1 (top of doc, matching
D11/D15 placement convention):
- Documents the "usable chunks streamed" semantics precisely
- Behavior split: chunks.length > 0 + SPAWN_FAILED → synthesize stop
+ return (Case B); chunks.length === 0 + SPAWN_FAILED → re-throw
(Case A, hard trigger fires as before)
- finish_reason='length' rationale (4 reasons documented)
- Streaming-path note: ADR 0004 first-chunk rule already handles the
analogous case for D10's real-streaming branch; D16 applies to
buffered path only
- Cache behavior: write-through `getOrCompute` (preserves D4 singleflight
during truncation event) then evict via `set(ttlMs=0)` (so future
fresh callers re-spawn). `__truncated` non-enumerable marker
travels with the chunks array for follower visibility
2. server.mjs `collectAllChunks` salvage path:
- try/catch around the for-await loop
- On SPAWN_FAILED with chunks.length > 0: synthesize stop chunk
`{type:'stop', finish_reason:'length'}`, log warn event
`spawn_failed_after_usable_chunks`, mark chunks array with
non-enumerable `__truncated`, return (no re-throw)
- On SPAWN_FAILED with chunks.length === 0 OR any other error:
re-throw (preserves existing hard-trigger semantics)
3. server.mjs `executeHopFn` cache eviction:
- After `cacheStore.getOrCompute(...)` returns, check `result.__truncated`
- If truncated: `cacheStore.set(keyId, hopCacheKey, result, 0)` —
ttlMs=0 causes `_isAlive` to treat the entry as expired on next
read (verified in lib/cache/store.mjs)
4. test-features.mjs Suite 13 — 3 new tests:
- Case A regression: SPAWN_FAILED at iter 0 + 2-hop chain → openai
serves, X-OLP-Fallback-Hops: 1 (no behavior change)
- Case B 2-hop: 2 deltas + SPAWN_FAILED → anthropic serves with
synthesized stop, hops=0, finish_reason='length', content
concatenates, openai NOT called
- Case B single-hop: 1 delta + SPAWN_FAILED → HTTP 200 (not 502),
finish_reason='length', partial content visible
Tests: 297 → 300 (+3). All pass on Node 20.
Pre-commit fold-ins (per evidence-first checkpoint #4 — fold-ins
themselves need second-pass review):
- **Error-chunk-in-chunks fold-in (sonnet flagged)**: pre-D12 code
pushed error chunks BEFORE throwing. Post-D16's `chunks.length > 0`
check would incorrectly include an error chunk and trigger Case B
for a path that's actually Case A. Moved the `type === 'error'`
check BEFORE the push, restoring the invariant that the chunks
array contains only delta/stop chunks. Verified all 3 scenarios:
(1) error at iter 0 → throws before push → length=0 → Case A
(2) delta×2 + error at iter 3 → throws before push → length=2 → Case B
with delta×2 + synthesized stop (no error chunk leaks)
(3) delta + non-zero exit from outside loop → length=1 → Case B
- **ADR doc-code drift fold-in (D16 reviewer flagged)**: original
Amendment 1 text said the salvaged result "bypasses
cacheStore.getOrCompute and is returned directly, exactly as the
cache-bypass path does." This was factually wrong — the code
write-throughs via getOrCompute then evicts via ttlMs=0. The drift
was ironic: D16 was about removing doc-code drift in ADR 0004
bullet 3 itself, and the amendment was about to ship fresh drift.
Corrected to accurately describe the write-then-evict pattern and
the rationale (preserving D4 singleflight during truncation events).
Authority:
- ADR 0004 § Trigger taxonomy Hard triggers bullet 3 (the qualifier
this amendment makes load-bearing)
https://github.com/dtzp555-max/olp/blob/main/docs/adr/0004-fallback-engine.md
- ADR 0005 § Cache write conditions item 1 — "response completed
successfully (no truncation, no error mid-stream)"
- OpenAI Chat Completions finish_reason enum (stop|length|tool_calls|
content_filter|function_call|null)
https://platform.openai.com/docs/api-reference/chat/object
- ADR 0004 § Fallback safety — first-chunk rule (already governs the
analogous case in the real-streaming path)
- ALIGNMENT.md Rule 2(c) spirit — ADR amendment + code change land
in same merge (D11 / D15 precedent)
- CC 开发铁律 v1.6 § 10.x — Cold Audit caught this; diff-review
passes focused on first-chunk rule for streaming missed the
buffered path's truncation-vs-fallback decision point
Reviewer (Iron Rule v1.6 § 10.x Mode A, fresh-context opus, independent
of drafter): APPROVE_WITH_MINOR. Folded the ADR doc-code drift minor
before commit. Walked all 3 error-chunk scenarios against actual code
to verify the pre-commit fold-in is correct. Analyzed the eviction
race window (sub-ms post-inflight pre-eviction window where a fresh
caller could hit the truncated cache before eviction lands) and
concluded it's structurally bounded — one-shot leak per truncation
event; subsequent callers re-spawn. Acceptable as v0.1.
Follow-up items (reviewer's non-blocking suggestions, NOT in this PR):
- 4th test asserting second identical request triggers fresh spawn
(defense-in-depth around the eviction; store.mjs ttlMs=0 semantics
are independently established)
- `cacheStore.delete()` API (cleaner than set-with-ttlMs=0 — leaves
no dead entry in the namespace map; future PR)
- `cache_evicted_truncated` log event for dashboard observability
- SPAWN_TIMEOUT salvage parity — same architectural argument as
SPAWN_FAILED (user paid for partial content); deferred as a
separate cold-audit finding for a future D-stage
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
||
|
taodengandClaude Opus 4.7
|
8ae77c3ae3 |
fix(cache)+docs(adr-0005): D15 — expand cache key composition to include max_tokens/top_p/stop/tool_choice
cold-audit catch from 2026-05-23
Cold-audit Finding 7 (P2 cache correctness). ADR 0005 § Cache key
composition (v1.0) listed 7 fields. ADR 0003 § Optional fields added
`max_tokens`, `top_p`, `stop`, `tool_choice` as IR-carried fields
that affect model output. Pre-D15 cache key omitted those 4 —
identical IRs differing only in those fields collided on the same
cache key but produced legitimately different outputs. Concrete
hazard: a request with `max_tokens: 100` could receive a cached
response generated by `max_tokens: 4000` — wrong content (truncated
or unexpectedly extended).
Coordinated change across two layers, single commit per the ADR-with-
code pattern established by D11:
1. docs/adr/0005-cache-cross-provider.md — Amendment 2 (top of doc,
matching D11 Amendment 1 placement convention)
- Documents the 4 missing fields + concrete failure mode
- Expands the v1.0 cache key composition spec
- Documents the `?? null` collapsing semantics (explicit-null
equals absent — consistent with existing temperature/response_format)
- Adds forward-looking note: future IR field additions must be
evaluated for cache-key inclusion at addition time; default is
include unless explicit rationale documents safe omission
2. lib/cache/keys.mjs — append the 4 fields to `keyObj` after the
existing 7 (preserves field ordering; pre-D15 cache entries are
forced misses on first request — schema forward-compatible)
- `max_tokens: ir.max_tokens ?? null`
- `top_p: ir.top_p ?? null`
- `stop: ir.stop ?? null`
- `tool_choice: ir.tool_choice ?? null`
- Updated file-level docblock + function-level JSDoc + @param ir
enumeration to reflect new schema (the @param fix also closes a
pre-existing partial-list issue that omitted cache_control)
3. test-features.mjs — 5 new tests in Suite 9:
- max_tokens differs → different key
- top_p differs → different key
- stop differs → different key
- tool_choice differs → different key (covers string-form
`'auto'` vs `'none'`; object-form coverage left for future
defense-in-depth — slot existence is verified by the string case)
- Both-absent stability check (`?? null` collapsing produces
identical keys for omitted-vs-omitted)
Tests: 292 → 297 (+5). No hash constants pinned in existing tests
(grep verified) so no pre-D15 tests required updating; assertions
were already shape-based (`assert.equal` / `assert.notEqual` on
hash strings, never specific hex values).
Authority:
- ADR 0003 § Optional fields — source of the 4 IR field definitions
https://github.com/dtzp555-max/olp/blob/main/docs/adr/0003-intermediate-representation.md
- ADR 0005's stated invariant: "different output → different cache
entry" — the addition restores compliance with this invariant
- OpenAI /v1/chat/completions spec — confirms the 4 fields affect
output:
https://platform.openai.com/docs/api-reference/chat/create
- ALIGNMENT.md Rule 2(c) spirit — ADR amendment + code change land
in same merge (D11 precedent established this pattern for
Provider-contract changes; D15 applies same pattern for cache-key
schema changes)
- CC 开发铁律 v1.6 § 10.x — Cold Audit caught this; diff-review pass
that approved original ADR 0005 did not cross-reference all ADR
0003 optional fields
Reviewer (Iron Rule v1.6 § 10.x Mode A, fresh-context opus, independent
of drafter): APPROVE_WITH_MINOR. Folded the one minor (`@param ir`
JSDoc stale partial list) before commit — same JSDoc precision logic
that drove D11's B1 fold-in. Two remaining non-blocking suggestions
(tool_choice object-form test coverage; D11-vs-D15 amendment structure
template) tracked as defense-in-depth opportunities, not required for
spec compliance.
Reviewer's highest-value verification: field ordering preserved.
keyObj at lib/cache/keys.mjs:203-217 reads exactly:
`{provider, model, messages, tools, temperature, response_format,
cache_control, max_tokens, top_p, stop, tool_choice}` — existing 7
in unchanged positions, 4 new appended at end. JSON.stringify on
Node 18+ preserves insertion order; SHA-256 hash deterministic
across runs.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
||
|
taodengandClaude Opus 4.7
|
f659e29c09 |
docs(adr-0002): D11 amendment — add maxSpawnTimeMs to Provider contract hints
cold-audit catch from 2026-05-23 Retroactive contract sync addressing cold-audit Finding 4 (P2 governance). D10 (commit |
||
|
taodengandClaude Opus 4.7 (noreply@anthropic.com)
|
dff428f3d0 |
docs(governance): fold in codex round-2 review findings (6 issues)
External Codex CLI review pass 2 surfaced 6 substantive issues that round 1 fold-in missed — the self-consistency trap recurred when fold-in was scoped only to files codex explicitly named in round 1. This commit closes round 2 in full. 1. ADR 0002 contradicted ALIGNMENT.md (P1, codex round 2 finding 1) ADR 0002 still said "three default-enabled (Anthropic, OpenAI Codex, Mistral Vibe)" while ALIGNMENT.md (post round 1) said v0.1 ships zero Enabled Providers. Accepted ADR contradicted constitution. Fix: ADR 0002 + ADR 0001 + docs/adr/README.md index rewritten to Candidate framing. 2. release.yml would publish stale v0.1.0-bootstrap notes (P1, round 2 finding 2) The "Unreleased" amendments would have been silently dropped on tag push because release.yml extracts only the matching version section. Fix: CHANGELOG restructured so the amended state IS the v0.1.0- bootstrap section. Full review history (opus + 2 codex rounds) captured inline. 3. package.json advertised non-existent entrypoints (P2, round 2 finding 3) main/scripts.test/scripts.start pointed to files that do not exist. Local npm test and npm start failed; CI masked. Fix: remove all three from package.json. They return in Phase 1 alongside the real files. test.yml bootstrap-tolerance updated to also skip when scripts.test is absent. 4. models-registry.json missing despite SPOT claim (P2, round 2 finding 4) Fix: minimal stub committed (version + empty providers map). alignment.yml validator now actually runs. 5. alignment.yml commit-citation soft check Bash subshell trap (P2, round 2 finding 5) git log ... while read ... WARN=1 — the while loop ran in a subshell because of the pipe, so WARN never propagated out. The post-loop check always reported "clean" even when warnings fired. Fix: process substitution done less than less than (git log ...). 6. Tier A "permanent" wording inconsistent across ADR 0006 + alignment. yml workflow text (P3, round 2 finding 6) Fix: unified to "Excluded by default with no routine reinstatement path; re-inclusion requires ADR 0006 supersession or amendment with new primary-source evidence." Reviewer: OpenAI Codex CLI (external, fresh-context, pass 2). Iron Rule 10 satisfied — round 2 reviewer was not the implementer of round 1 fold-in. Memory learning updated: the self-consistency trap recurs in the fold-in step. Future fold-ins must grep the entire repo for the concept, not only edit files the reviewer named. See learnings/ai_reviewer_self_ consistency_trap.md in cross-machine memory. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (noreply@anthropic.com) |
||
|
taodengandClaude Opus 4.7
|
91223ee9ab |
docs(governance): fold in 6 codex review findings
External Codex CLI review surfaced 6 substantive findings beyond what
the internal opus reviewer caught at D1. All folded in this commit.
Files changed: ALIGNMENT.md, README.md, ADR 0001, ADR 0006, CHANGELOG.
1. Provider Inventory split: Candidate vs Enabled
- Bootstrap previously listed anthropic/openai/mistral as Tier D
default-enabled with Authority pins still "TBD at Phase N spawn".
This violated Rule 1 (Cite First) and Rule 3 (Match Implementation).
- v0.1 founding now ships 0 Enabled Providers. All 8 are Candidate.
Enablement requires: authority pin filled + plugin landed + Phase
audit passed.
2. Antigravity Tier A downgraded to "evidence-backed pending pin"
- Secondary reports disagree on blast radius (piunikaweb 03-02 says
AI-tier only; piunikaweb 02-23 + OpenClaw issue + VentureBeat say
broader). Google FAQ language naming OpenClaw/OpenCode/Claude Code
is cited from secondary sources only — primary URL not pinned.
- Exclusion remains active by default; constitutional weight matches
evidence. Primary-source pinning tracked as one-shot audit task
with 90-day Tier-reconsideration trigger.
3. ADR 0001 supersession scope narrowed
- Previous draft claimed OLP is "the structural shape ADR 0005
endorsed," but ADR 0005's separate-repo recommendation came with
"BYOK from day one" + "no cli.js spawn" qualifiers OLP rejects.
- Supersession now narrowly scoped to "single-provider-sufficiency
premise only"; BYOK + no-spawn parts of ADR 0005 explicitly NOT
inherited.
4. Anthropic post-2026-06-15 one-shot audit scheduled
- Annual 14 May audit would leave the Anthropic Tier re-eval almost
a year late after the 2026-06-15 split.
- Added one-shot audit for 2026-06-16 (or first billing-cycle close)
verifying observed behaviour matches spec §2 assumptions.
5. Tier A "permanent" wording unified
- ALIGNMENT.md and ADR 0006 disagreed (permanent vs amendable).
Unified as "Excluded by default. Cannot be re-included unless
ADR 0006 is superseded/amended with new primary-source evidence."
6. OpenAI Tier D wording softened
- Discussion #8338 was framed as "maintainer confirmed permissive";
actual quote is a maintainer posture statement with explicit "I'm
an engineer, not a lawyer" caveat.
- Now: "maintainer signal indicates low risk; formal ToS pin pending."
Reviewer: OpenAI Codex CLI (external, fresh-context). Iron Rule 10
satisfied — internal opus reviewer was not the source of these
findings; reviewer and maintainer are distinct.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
||
|
taodengandClaude Opus 4.7
|
0041fb1017 |
chore: bootstrap OLP v0.1 — multi-provider LLM proxy
Initial release. OLP (Open LLM Proxy) is a personal- and family-scale
multi-provider LLM proxy that supersedes OCP (Open Claude Proxy).
Trigger: Anthropic's 2026-05-14 announcement (effective 2026-06-15)
moves `claude -p` / Agent SDK / third-party agent traffic out of the
Pro/Max subscription pool into a separate fixed monthly Agent SDK
Credit pool. OCP's foundational assumption ("subscription = unlimited
within rate limits") breaks for Anthropic on that date. Spreading
risk across multiple providers is the structural response.
Phase 0 lands:
- ALIGNMENT.md (constitution: 5 Rules, 3 Authorities, 4-tier Risk
Framework, 8-provider inventory)
- AGENTS.md (multi-tool agent guidelines; inherits cc-rules)
- CLAUDE.md (Claude-Code session instructions + release_kit overlay)
- README.md (phase-aware skeleton)
- docs/adr/0001-0006 (Founding ADRs: project founding / plugin
architecture / IR design / fallback engine / cross-provider cache /
provider inclusion + risk-tier framework)
- .github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md (8-radio Change Type + per-type
Authority Evidence + Iron Rule 10 reviewer checklist)
- .github/workflows/alignment.yml (blacklist + Antigravity exclusion
enforcement + models-registry validator + commit-citation soft check)
- .github/workflows/release.yml (auto-release on tag with version
match check per Iron Rule 5)
- .github/workflows/test.yml (Node 20/24 matrix, bootstrap-tolerant)
- package.json, .gitignore, LICENSE (MIT), CHANGELOG.md
Provider inventory at bootstrap:
Tier D (default-enabled): anthropic, openai, mistral
Tier C (opt-in): grok, kimi
Tier B (opt-in + consent): minimax, glm, qwen
Tier A (permanently excluded): google-antigravity
Supersedes OCP ADR 0005 (No Multi-Provider) per OLP ADR 0001. OCP
will enter maintenance mode when OLP v0.1 ships per Phase 7 plan.
Iron Rule 10 gate: fresh-context independent opus reviewer audited
all 15 governance files against OLP v0.1 spec + OCP precedent.
Verdict: APPROVE_WITH_MINOR. Two minor findings folded in:
1. alignment.yml heredoc EOF moved to column 0 (was indented;
bash parse failed silently on real blacklist hits, printing
a cryptic "syntax error" instead of the structured ALIGNMENT
GUARDRAIL FAILURE banner).
2. AGENTS.md clarified that the SPOT discipline for
models-registry.json will be codified by a Phase-1 ADR (OLP
ADR 0003 is currently the IR design, not a SPOT codification;
OCP's ADR 0003 is the precedent but OLP's registry shape
differs and warrants its own ADR).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
|