mirror of
https://github.com/dtzp555-max/olp.git
synced 2026-07-21 21:15:10 +00:00
docs(governance): fold in codex round-2 review findings (6 issues)
External Codex CLI review pass 2 surfaced 6 substantive issues that round 1 fold-in missed — the self-consistency trap recurred when fold-in was scoped only to files codex explicitly named in round 1. This commit closes round 2 in full. 1. ADR 0002 contradicted ALIGNMENT.md (P1, codex round 2 finding 1) ADR 0002 still said "three default-enabled (Anthropic, OpenAI Codex, Mistral Vibe)" while ALIGNMENT.md (post round 1) said v0.1 ships zero Enabled Providers. Accepted ADR contradicted constitution. Fix: ADR 0002 + ADR 0001 + docs/adr/README.md index rewritten to Candidate framing. 2. release.yml would publish stale v0.1.0-bootstrap notes (P1, round 2 finding 2) The "Unreleased" amendments would have been silently dropped on tag push because release.yml extracts only the matching version section. Fix: CHANGELOG restructured so the amended state IS the v0.1.0- bootstrap section. Full review history (opus + 2 codex rounds) captured inline. 3. package.json advertised non-existent entrypoints (P2, round 2 finding 3) main/scripts.test/scripts.start pointed to files that do not exist. Local npm test and npm start failed; CI masked. Fix: remove all three from package.json. They return in Phase 1 alongside the real files. test.yml bootstrap-tolerance updated to also skip when scripts.test is absent. 4. models-registry.json missing despite SPOT claim (P2, round 2 finding 4) Fix: minimal stub committed (version + empty providers map). alignment.yml validator now actually runs. 5. alignment.yml commit-citation soft check Bash subshell trap (P2, round 2 finding 5) git log ... while read ... WARN=1 — the while loop ran in a subshell because of the pipe, so WARN never propagated out. The post-loop check always reported "clean" even when warnings fired. Fix: process substitution done less than less than (git log ...). 6. Tier A "permanent" wording inconsistent across ADR 0006 + alignment. yml workflow text (P3, round 2 finding 6) Fix: unified to "Excluded by default with no routine reinstatement path; re-inclusion requires ADR 0006 supersession or amendment with new primary-source evidence." Reviewer: OpenAI Codex CLI (external, fresh-context, pass 2). Iron Rule 10 satisfied — round 2 reviewer was not the implementer of round 1 fold-in. Memory learning updated: the self-consistency trap recurs in the fold-in step. Future fold-ins must grep the entire repo for the concept, not only edit files the reviewer named. See learnings/ai_reviewer_self_ consistency_trap.md in cross-machine memory. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (noreply@anthropic.com)
This commit is contained in:
co-authored by
Claude Opus 4.7 (noreply@anthropic.com)
parent
91223ee9ab
commit
dff428f3d0
+1
-1
@@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ New ADRs increment from the highest existing number. Filenames are `NNNN-<short-
|
||||
| [0003](0003-intermediate-representation.md) | Intermediate Representation (IR) Design | The OLP-internal canonical request/response shape between the OpenAI-compat entry surface and each provider plugin. v1.0 IR fields, IR-vs-OpenAI-vs-native-provider three-shape model, IR is not exposed externally. |
|
||||
| [0004](0004-fallback-engine.md) | Fallback Engine Semantics & Safety | Trigger taxonomy (Hard / Soft / Deterministic-deferred / Cost-aware-deferred), idempotent-failure safety (first-chunk rule), chain advancement one-at-a-time, observability headers. |
|
||||
| [0005](0005-cache-cross-provider.md) | Cache Layer Cross-Provider Design | Cache key composition over `(provider, model, messages, …)`, per-model isolation, D1+D2+D3+D4 port from OCP v3.13.0, cross-provider fallback cache behaviour (correct miss). |
|
||||
| [0006](0006-provider-inclusion.md) | Provider Inclusion / Exclusion + Risk-Tier Framework | The 4-tier classification (A excluded / B explicit consent / C opt-in / D default-enabled), current v0.1 inventory, Antigravity exclusion rationale (named prohibition + no cost advantage + reinstatement friction), consent UX, future provider addition procedure. |
|
||||
| [0006](0006-provider-inclusion.md) | Provider Inclusion / Exclusion + Risk-Tier Framework | The 4-tier classification (A excluded by default / B explicit consent / C opt-in / D eligible-for-default-enabled), Candidate-vs-Enabled distinction, current v0.1 candidate inventory (0 Enabled), Antigravity exclusion rationale (named prohibition + no cost advantage + reinstatement friction; pending primary-source pin), consent UX, future provider addition procedure. |
|
||||
|
||||
## When to write a new ADR
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user