docs: D20 — honest forward-reference annotations across README/ADRs (Finding 9)

cold-audit catch from 2026-05-23

Cold-audit Finding 9 (P3 drift): multiple docs referenced files / paths
/ directories that don't exist at the current implementation state. A
reader following AGENTS.md § "Key files to know" to read lib/keys.mjs
would find no such file; following README architecture to dashboard.html
same; ADR 0005 § D1 described a `~/.olp/cache/<key>/<prefix>/<hash>.json`
layout that doesn't exist (current impl is in-memory Map per
lib/cache/store.mjs). D20 doesn't gut the designs — it adds honest
status callouts so the gap is obvious within seconds.

Files changed (8, docs only, +46 / -14):

1. README.md (+32 / -3):
   - New H2 section "Implementation status (as of 2026-05-24)" with a
     10-row table distinguishing ✅ Shipped vs 📋 Planned, including phase
     numbers (Phase 2 / 6 / 7) matching the existing §"Phase plan"
   - Inline status annotation on the multi-key auth bullet
     (lib/keys.mjs marked planned for Phase 2)
   - Inline status on the cache layer bullet (file-backed storage marked
     Phase 2 — current is in-memory Map)
   - Migration section's Phase 7 placeholder annotated explicitly

2. AGENTS.md (+8 / -3):
   - Inline `📋 Planned (Phase N) — not yet authored` markers on
     lib/keys.mjs and dashboard.html in the "Key files" bullet list
   - Inline marker on setup.mjs reference in the
     "Project-specific constraints" section
   - New "Implementation status note" paragraph at the end of the Key
     files block pointing to README's status table for the full picture

3. ALIGNMENT.md (+6 / -3):
   - docs/openai-spec-pin.md references (Authority 2 + audits section)
     tightened from "deferred" to "deferred, not yet authored; must be
     created before first annual audit (target: v1.0)"
   - docs/alignment-audits/ directory annotated as "directory does not
     exist yet; it is created when the first audit is conducted"

4. CLAUDE.md (+2):
   - release_kit.bootstrap_quirk_policy YAML retains the
     scripts/migrate-from-ocp.mjs reference (forward-looking spec
     compliance) and adds an inline YAML comment explicitly noting
     "is planned (Phase 7), not yet authored. The scripts/ directory
     does not currently exist. References here are forward-looking;
     do not attempt to run this script."

5-8. ADR amendments (status notes only — no Amendment blocks, since
     these are clarifications about implementation state, NOT decision
     changes per se):
   - ADR 0001 (Consequences/Negative): scripts/migrate-from-ocp.mjs
     annotated as Phase 7 planned
   - ADR 0003 § Decision (lossy-translation paragraph): inline note that
     docs/provider-caveats.md is planned; until it exists, lossy edges
     are recorded only in plugin headers. Plus a status mention in
     Consequences/Positive
   - ADR 0004 Mitigations: docs/provider-caveats.md annotated as planned
   - ADR 0005 § Decision (D1 paragraph): the file-backed layout block
     reframed from "Cache directory structure:" to "Designed file-backed
     layout (target for Phase 2 storage adapter):". Added a status
     blockquote explicitly noting "v0.1 implementation in lib/cache/store.mjs
     uses an in-memory Map; no files written to ~/.olp/cache/. The
     file-backed layout described above is the designed shape; it
     transitions in via a Phase 2 storage adapter. Per-key isolation and
     singleflight (D4) are live; file persistence is not."

Note on ADR Decision-section edits (corrected from initial writeup):
two ADR amendments DO touch Decision-section text (ADR 0003 lossy-
translation paragraph, ADR 0005 D1 cache layout). Both edits are
conservative — status caveats that preserve the original prose verbatim
(0003) or reframe section headings without changing the path-shape spec
(0005). No design content is gutted. No Amendment block was added
because the decisions themselves aren't changing; these are clarifications
about what's live today vs designed. The discipline boundary here:
inline-status-note ≠ decision-amendment.

Tests: 328/328 unchanged (sanity check; docs-only changes).

7/7 Finding 9 forward references annotated (confirmed by reviewer
running independent `ls` on each path):
- lib/keys.mjs ❌ doesn't exist → annotated
- dashboard.html ❌ doesn't exist → annotated
- docs/provider-caveats.md ❌ → annotated (2 ADR sites + Consequences)
- docs/openai-spec-pin.md ❌ → annotated (ALIGNMENT.md Authority 2)
- docs/alignment-audits/ ❌ → annotated
- scripts/migrate-from-ocp.mjs ❌ → annotated (README + ADR 0001 + CLAUDE.md release_kit)
- setup.mjs ❌ → annotated (AGENTS.md)

Authority:
- README/AGENTS.md/ADR/ALIGNMENT.md/CLAUDE.md self — the doc set is
  its own authority for what it documents; D20 brings each statement
  into honest agreement with the current implementation
- CC 开发铁律 v1.6 § 10.x — Cold Audit Finding 9

Reviewer (Iron Rule v1.6 § 10.x Mode A, fresh-context opus, independent
of drafter): APPROVE_WITH_MINOR. Verified each Finding 9 path doesn't
exist via independent `ls`; cross-checked phase numbers match the
existing §"Phase plan" listing; ran `npm test` to confirm 328/328
unchanged. Two non-blocking minors:

1. Implementer's initial writeup overstated "ADR decision text NOT
   edited" — reality is two Decision-section paragraphs got inline
   status caveats. Commit message above is corrected.

2. Reviewer found an additional drift D20 didn't address: ADR 0002 §
   Decision filesystem layout lists `vibe.mjs` for the Mistral plugin,
   but the shipped file is `mistral.mjs` (the binary is `vibe`, the
   plugin file is `mistral`). Different drift class from Finding 9
   (file exists, just named differently in the ADR). Filed as
   follow-up issue.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>

ALIGNMENT.md

@@ -65,7 +65,7 @@ OLP exposes a single external HTTP surface: `/v1/chat/completions` in OpenAI Cha
 
 Citation format for entry-surface PRs: OpenAI spec URL + the specific field, parameter, or behaviour. Example: `OpenAI Chat Completions, response_format parameter (https://platform.openai.com/docs/api-reference/chat/create#chat-create-response_format)`.
 
-The spec pin lives in `docs/openai-spec-pin.md` (created at Phase 1; not required for v0.1 governance bootstrap to land).
+The spec pin lives in `docs/openai-spec-pin.md` — deferred, not yet authored; will land before the first annual audit (target: v1.0). Not required for v0.1 governance bootstrap.
 
 ### Authority 3 — IR contract (internal interop scope)
 
@@ -154,10 +154,10 @@ In addition to the recurring 14 May audit below, the following one-shot audits a
 
 - **Date:** 14 May each year (the anniversary of the Anthropic 2026-05-14 announcement, which is the structural trigger for OLP).
 - **Scope (per-provider plugin):** For each enabled provider, re-audit the provider CLI version against the pin in the Authorities table above. Re-verify that every spawn invocation, flag, and output-parser expectation in `lib/providers/<name>.mjs` still matches that CLI version's actual behaviour. Update the pin row in this file.
-- **Scope (entry surface):** Snapshot OpenAI's `/v1/chat/completions` specification and diff against the pin in `docs/openai-spec-pin.md`. For each field OLP implements, verify the spec still defines it the same way. Update the pin.
+- **Scope (entry surface):** Snapshot OpenAI's `/v1/chat/completions` specification and diff against the pin in `docs/openai-spec-pin.md` (📋 deferred — not yet authored; must be created before the first annual audit). For each field OLP implements, verify the spec still defines it the same way. Update the pin.
 - **Scope (IR):** Diff the IR documented in ADR 0003 against the implementation in `lib/ir/`. Any drift triggers an amendment or a deletion PR.
 - **Scope (Risk Tier reclassifications):** For each provider, re-evaluate the risk tier against current ToS, FAQ language, and observed enforcement events from the past year. Reclassifications land as ADR 0006 amendments.
-- **Output:** A signed audit note committed to `docs/alignment-audits/YYYY-05-14.md`, updating pins inline in this file as needed.
+- **Output:** A signed audit note committed to `docs/alignment-audits/YYYY-05-14.md` (📋 `docs/alignment-audits/` directory does not exist yet; it is created when the first audit is conducted). Inline pin updates go into this file.
 - **Failure mode:** Any finding that cannot be reconciled triggers an immediate deletion PR per the Unalignable Policy.
 
 ---