docs(governance): fold in 6 codex review findings

External Codex CLI review surfaced 6 substantive findings beyond what
the internal opus reviewer caught at D1. All folded in this commit.
Files changed: ALIGNMENT.md, README.md, ADR 0001, ADR 0006, CHANGELOG.

1. Provider Inventory split: Candidate vs Enabled
   - Bootstrap previously listed anthropic/openai/mistral as Tier D
     default-enabled with Authority pins still "TBD at Phase N spawn".
     This violated Rule 1 (Cite First) and Rule 3 (Match Implementation).
   - v0.1 founding now ships 0 Enabled Providers. All 8 are Candidate.
     Enablement requires: authority pin filled + plugin landed + Phase
     audit passed.

2. Antigravity Tier A downgraded to "evidence-backed pending pin"
   - Secondary reports disagree on blast radius (piunikaweb 03-02 says
     AI-tier only; piunikaweb 02-23 + OpenClaw issue + VentureBeat say
     broader). Google FAQ language naming OpenClaw/OpenCode/Claude Code
     is cited from secondary sources only — primary URL not pinned.
   - Exclusion remains active by default; constitutional weight matches
     evidence. Primary-source pinning tracked as one-shot audit task
     with 90-day Tier-reconsideration trigger.

3. ADR 0001 supersession scope narrowed
   - Previous draft claimed OLP is "the structural shape ADR 0005
     endorsed," but ADR 0005's separate-repo recommendation came with
     "BYOK from day one" + "no cli.js spawn" qualifiers OLP rejects.
   - Supersession now narrowly scoped to "single-provider-sufficiency
     premise only"; BYOK + no-spawn parts of ADR 0005 explicitly NOT
     inherited.

4. Anthropic post-2026-06-15 one-shot audit scheduled
   - Annual 14 May audit would leave the Anthropic Tier re-eval almost
     a year late after the 2026-06-15 split.
   - Added one-shot audit for 2026-06-16 (or first billing-cycle close)
     verifying observed behaviour matches spec §2 assumptions.

5. Tier A "permanent" wording unified
   - ALIGNMENT.md and ADR 0006 disagreed (permanent vs amendable).
     Unified as "Excluded by default. Cannot be re-included unless
     ADR 0006 is superseded/amended with new primary-source evidence."

6. OpenAI Tier D wording softened
   - Discussion #8338 was framed as "maintainer confirmed permissive";
     actual quote is a maintainer posture statement with explicit "I'm
     an engineer, not a lawyer" caveat.
   - Now: "maintainer signal indicates low risk; formal ToS pin pending."

Reviewer: OpenAI Codex CLI (external, fresh-context). Iron Rule 10
satisfied — internal opus reviewer was not the source of these
findings; reviewer and maintainer are distinct.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>

CHANGELOG.md

@@ -2,6 +2,21 @@
 
 All notable changes to OLP land here. Per `CLAUDE.md` release_kit overlay, this file is the source of truth for GitHub release notes.
 
+## Unreleased — 2026-05-23 (governance amendments per external codex review)
+
+External AI review (OpenAI Codex CLI) of the bootstrap governance surfaced six substantive findings beyond what the internal opus reviewer caught. All six folded in this turn:
+
+1. **Provider Inventory split into Candidate vs Enabled** — ALIGNMENT.md previously listed `anthropic` / `openai` / `mistral` as Tier D default-enabled while their Authority pins were still `TBD at Phase N spawn`. This violated Rule 1 (Cite First) and Rule 3 (Match the Implementation). The v0.1 founding commit now ships **zero Enabled Providers**; all 8 providers are Candidate. Enablement is a Phase audit deliverable, not a bootstrap claim. (ALIGNMENT.md § Provider Inventory; README.md § Supported Providers.)
+2. **Antigravity Tier A evidence strength downgraded to "evidence-backed, pending primary-source pin"** — ADR 0006 previously framed the Antigravity exclusion as a closed case based on secondary reports. The reports actually disagree on blast radius (piunikaweb 03-02 says AI-tier only; piunikaweb 02-23, OpenClaw issue #14203, VentureBeat say broader). The Google FAQ language naming OpenClaw/OpenCode/Claude Code is cited from secondary sources only; the original FAQ URL or archival snapshot has not been primary-source-pinned. The exclusion is still active by default, but the constitutional weight now matches the evidence: secondary-sourced. Primary-source pinning is tracked as an open one-shot audit task with a 90-day Tier-reconsideration trigger.
+3. **ADR 0001 supersession scope honesty** — ADR 0001 previously claimed OLP is "the structural shape ADR 0005 endorsed: a separate repo with multi-provider design baked in from day one." But ADR 0005's separate-repo recommendation came with two qualifiers OLP rejects: "BYOK from day one" and "no `cli.js` spawn." OLP rejects both — it is non-commercial and explicitly spawn-binary. The supersession is now narrowly scoped to "single-provider-sufficiency premise only"; the BYOK / no-spawn parts of ADR 0005 are not inherited.
+4. **Anthropic post-2026-06-15 one-shot audit scheduled** — ALIGNMENT.md's annual 14 May audit would have left the Anthropic Tier re-evaluation almost a year late. Added a one-shot audit for 2026-06-16 (or first Anthropic billing-cycle close) that verifies the post-effective-date behaviour and updates ADR 0006 + Authority pin.
+5. **Tier A "permanent" language unified across docs** — ALIGNMENT.md and ADR 0006 disagreed: one said "permanently excluded," the other said "amendment-procedure-revisable." Unified as "Excluded by default. Cannot be re-included unless ADR 0006 is superseded or amended with new primary-source evidence." The amendment procedure remains available; "Tier A" sets the bar for re-inclusion at constitutional-amendment level, not at routine PR level.
+6. **OpenAI Tier D wording softened** — ADR 0006 previously described Codex Discussion #8338 as "maintainer confirmed permissive." The discussion is actually a maintainer posture statement ("OSS projects like OpenCode are doing things similar") with an explicit "I'm an engineer, not a lawyer" caveat. Now described as "maintainer signal indicates low risk; formal ToS pin pending" with the pin tracked as a follow-up audit task.
+
+Files changed: `ALIGNMENT.md`, `README.md`, `docs/adr/0001-project-founding.md`, `docs/adr/0006-provider-inclusion.md`. No code, no CI workflow, no PR template change.
+
+Reviewer for this amendment: OpenAI Codex CLI (external, fresh-context). Iron Rule 10 satisfied — the internal opus reviewer was not the source of the findings, and the maintainer is not the author of the underlying critique. The amendment's substantive changes are direct fold-ins of the reviewer's six findings; the internal opus reviewer's earlier APPROVE_WITH_MINOR verdict is therefore narrowed retroactively to "APPROVE conditional on these amendments" for the purposes of the v0.1 governance bootstrap.
+
 ## v0.1.0-bootstrap — 2026-05-23
 
 ### Phase 0 — Repo bootstrap